Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May:151:260-264.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

The value of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during Ramadan fasting

Affiliations
Review

The value of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during Ramadan fasting

Bachar Afandi et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May.

Abstract

Introduction: In order to achieve the recommended glycemic control, women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) are instructed to self-monitor blood glucose (SMBG) regularly. The purpose of this study was to evaluate glucose readings provided by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and SMBG in GDM patients during Ramadan fasting.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study that recruited GDM patients treated with diet ± metformin were enrolled. They agreed to wear the iPro®2 ProfessionalCGM device and to do SMBG by glucose reading meters, during fasting and after meals. We evaluated the rates of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in each approach. The frequency and timing of SMBG was investigated.

Results: Twenty-five patients were recruited. A total of 36,628 readings by CGM device and 408 readings using glucose meters and were captured. Average glucose level was 103 ± 8 mg/dl (5.7 ± 0.4 mmol/l) and 113 ± 14 mg/d (6.28 ± 0.8 mmol/L) on CGM and glucose meters respectively. The rate of hyperglycemia was 5.65% and 14.2% and hypoglycemia was 4.35% and 1.5% using CGM and glucose meters respectively. While all hypoglycemic episodes occurred between 16:00-19:00 in both approaches, only 38 readings (9%) of SMBG readings were done in that time frame.

Conclusion: Although the frequency of SMBG using glucose meters for women with GDM and fasting Ramadan was acceptable, the timing was not. CGM detected more hypoglycemia and less hyperglycemia than SMBG. Relying on Intermittent SMBG in the management of GDM patients during Ramadan fasting might be misleading.

Keywords: Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Fasting; Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Ramadan; Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

PubMed Disclaimer