Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 1;11(3):a032540.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032540.

The Origin of Biological Homochirality

Affiliations
Review

The Origin of Biological Homochirality

Donna G Blackmond. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. .

Abstract

The fact that sugars, amino acids, and the biological polymers they construct exist exclusively in one of two possible mirror-image forms has fascinated scientists and laymen alike for more than a century. Yet, it was only in the late 20th century that experimental studies began to probe how biological homochirality, a signature of life, arose from a prebiotic world that presumably contained equal amounts of both mirror-image forms of these molecules. This review discusses experimental studies aimed at understanding how chemical reactions, physical processes, or a combination of both may provide prebiotically relevant mechanisms for the enrichment of one form of a chiral molecule over the other to allow for the emergence of biological homochirality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Mirror-image molecules of alanine, a proteinogenic amino acid, and ribose, a pentose sugar. (B) Right-handed α-helix structures of a peptide from amino acids (left) and RNA from ribonucleotides (right).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Autocatalytic amplification of enantiomeric excess in the Soai alkylation of pyrimidyl aldehydes.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Prebiotically plausible reactions showing enantioenrichment of either sugars or amino acids.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Blackmond/Brown model (left) and product enantiomeric excess as a function of fraction conversion of substrate (right) predicted from reaction rate profiles fit to the kinetic model (blue lines) and corroborated by analysis of experimental enantiomeric excess (ee) data.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Equilibrium between chiral crystals and their saturated solution phases for systems comprised of an unequal number of d and l molecules. (Right) Racemic compound, in which heterochiral interactions are stronger than homochiral interactions; (left) conglomerate, in which homochiral interactions dominate.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Effect of stirring on rates of primary (A) versus secondary (B) nucleation in the “Eve crystal” model of conglomerate-forming NaClO3.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Evolution of solid phase homochirality based on dissolution and reaccretion of molecules from small crystals (shown in blue) of one enantiomer onto larger crystals (shown in purple) of the other enantiomer, through the conduit of solution phase interconversion between enantiomers.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Cosolvate enriches the solution phase enantiomeric excess by suppressing the solutility of the racemic compound. (Right) Crystal structure of LD proline with CH3Cl.

References

    1. Blackmond DG. 2004. Asymmetric autocatalysis and its implications for the origin of homochirality. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 5732–5736. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackmond DG. 2010. The origin of biological homochirality. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a002147. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackmond DG, McMillan CR, Ramdeehul S, Schorm A, Brown JM. 2001. Origins of asymmetric amplification in autocatalytic alkylzinc additions. J Am Chem Soc 123: 10103–10104. - PubMed
    1. Breslow R. 1959. On the mechanism of the formose reaction. Tetrahedron Lett 22–36.
    1. Breslow R, Cheng Z-L. 2009. On the origin of terrestrial homochirality for nucleosides and amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 9144–9146. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources