Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;46(8):952-959.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180829. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Intraarticular Glucocorticoid Injection as Second-line Treatment for Lyme Arthritis in Children

Affiliations

Intraarticular Glucocorticoid Injection as Second-line Treatment for Lyme Arthritis in Children

Daniel B Horton et al. J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether second-line intraarticular glucocorticoid (IAGC) injection improves outcomes in children with persistently active Lyme arthritis after initial antibiotics.

Methods: We conducted an observational comparative effectiveness study through chart review within 3 pediatric rheumatology centers with distinct clinical approaches to second-line treatment of Lyme arthritis. We primarily compared children receiving second-line IAGC to children receiving a second course of antibiotics alone. We evaluated the risk of developing antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis (ARLA) using logistic regression and the time to clinical resolution of Lyme arthritis using Cox regression.

Results: Of 112 children with persistently active Lyme arthritis after first-line antibiotics, 18 children received second-line IAGC (13 with concomitant oral antibiotics). Compared to children receiving second-line oral antibiotics alone, children treated with IAGC had similar baseline characteristics but lower rates of ARLA (17% vs 44%; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.95; p = 0.04) and faster rates of clinical resolution (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.9; p = 0.01). Children in IAGC and oral antibiotic cohorts did not differ in treatment-associated adverse events. Among children receiving second-line IAGC, outcomes appeared similar irrespective of use of concomitant antibiotics. Outcomes were also similar between intravenous (IV) and oral antibiotic-treated cohorts, but older children seemed to respond more favorably to IV therapy. IV antibiotics were also associated with higher rates of toxicity.

Conclusion: IAGC injection appears to be an effective and safe second-line strategy for persistent Lyme arthritis in children, associated with rapid clinical resolution and reduced need for additional treatment.

Keywords: COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; GLUCOCORTICOIDS; LYME ARTHRITIS; PEDIATRICS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Dr. Horton has received grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb for research unrelated to the present study. Dr. Rose has received grant funding from GSK for research unrelated to the present study. The other authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Subject selection diagram Of 383 children with documented Lyme arthritis, 112 met inclusion criteria by beginning second-line treatment for persistent arthritis within 120 days after starting first-line antibiotics, of whom 18 individuals (16%) received second-line intra-articular glucocorticoid (IAGC) injection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence curves of resolution of Lyme arthritis after initiating first-line antibiotics C-GC, intra-articular glucocorticoid cohort; C-IV, intravenous antibiotics cohort; C-PO, oral antibiotics cohort Cumulative incidence plots showing resolution of Lyme arthritis over the first 2 years of follow-up by cohort: C-PO (black, long dash line), C-GC (dark grey, solid line), or C-IV (light grey, short dash line). Log-rank tests are shown comparing either C-GC or C-IV antibiotics to C-PO.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Timeline of outcomes among study subjects. C-GC, intra-articular glucocorticoid cohort; C-IV, intravenous antibiotics cohort; C-PO, oral antibiotics cohort. Box plots showing, by treatment cohort, the timing from second-line treatment to the resolution of arthritis or the last visit (for those lost to follow-up). Boxes indicate the median (central bar), 25th, and 75th percentiles of values, with adjacent values shown with whiskers and outliers shown as circles.

Comment in

  • Treatment of Lyme Arthritis.
    Steere AC. Steere AC. J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):871-873. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190320. J Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 31371661 No abstract available.

References

    1. Kugeler KJ, Farley GM, Forrester JD, Mead PS. Geographic Distribution and Expansion of Human Lyme Disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:1455–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg R, Lindsey NP, Fischer M, Gregory CJ, Hinckley AF, Mead PS, et al. Vital Signs: Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases - United States and Territories, 2004-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:496–501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hubalek Z Epidemiology of Lyme borreliosis. Curr Probl Dermatol 2009;37:31–50. - PubMed
    1. Steere AC, Schoen RT, Taylor E. The clinical evolution of Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:725–31. - PubMed
    1. Gerber MA, Zemel LS, Shapiro ED. Lyme arthritis in children: clinical epidemiology and long-term outcomes. Pediatrics 1998;102:905–8. - PubMed

Publication types