Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1):e2018.00080.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00080.

Abdominal Compliance and Laparoscopy: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Abdominal Compliance and Laparoscopy: A Review

Douglas E Ott. JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Creating and maintaining a pneumoperitoneum to perform laparoscopy is governed by gas laws and the limiting physical constraints of the abdomen.

Methods: A review of how gas, biomechanical and physical properties affect the abdomen and a systematic structured Medline and PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant studies related to the topic.

Results: Abdominal compliance is a measure of ease of abdominal expansion and is determined by the elasticity of the abdominal wall and diaphragm. It is the change in intra-abdominal volume per change in intra-abdominal pressure. Caution should be exercised with pressures exceeding 12 millimeters mercury since this is defined as intra-abdominal hypertension.

Conclusions: Abdominal compliance has its limits, is unique for each patient and pressure-volume curves cannot be easily predicted. Using the lowest possible pressure to accomplish the surgical task without compromising surgical outcome is the desired goal. The clinical importance is caution and knowing there is a point where more pressure does not increase working space and only increases pressure.

Keywords: Compliance; Insufflation; Pneumoperitoneum; Pressure; Volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

    1. Malbrain M, De Laet I. Why we need guidelines and recommendations for research on intra-abdominal hypertension. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:183–184. 10.1007/s00134-009-1677-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malbrain M, De laet I, De Waele J, Sugrue M, Schachtrupp A, Duchesne J, Van Ramshorst G, De Leulenaer B, Kirkpatrick A, Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh S, Mulier J, Pelosi P, Ivantury R, Pracca F, David M, Roberts D. The role of abdominal compliance, the necglected parameter in critically ill patients – a consensus review of 16. Part 2: measurement techniques and management recommendations. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46:406–432. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Misiakos E, Patapis P, Zavras N, Tzanetis P, Machairas A. Current trends in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. JSLS. 2015;19:1–11. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00048. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malbrain M, Peeters Y, Wise R. The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions. Critical Care. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2016. http://www.springer.com/series/8901. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malbrain M, Roberts D, De laet I. The role of abdominal compliance, the neglected parameter in critically ill patients – a consensus review of 16. Part 1: Definitions and pathophysiology. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46:392–405. 10.5603/AIT.2014.0062. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources