Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;5(3):124-129.
doi: 10.5455/handmicrosurg.215015.

A chronically-denervated versus a freshly-harvested autograft for nerve repair in rats

Benjamin Richard Pulley  1 , Tianyi David Luo  2 , Jonathan C Barnwell  2 , Beth P Smith  2 , Thomas L Smith  2 , Zhongyu Li  2
Affiliations

A chronically-denervated versus a freshly-harvested autograft for nerve repair in rats

Benjamin Richard Pulley et al. Hand Microsurg. 2016.

Abstract

Objectives: Autologous nerve grafting remains the gold standard for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Its use, however, is limited by donor nerve availability and donor site morbidity. This is especially problematic after failure of an initial autograft that requires a repeat nerve graft, resulting in a second surgical site with associated morbidity. Based on the molecular differences in nerve degeneration in the proximal and distal segments after transection, we hypothesized that a chronically-denervated proximal stump may be viable for autologous nerve repair.

Methods: 20 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent right sciatic nerve excision and sural nerve transection. After 8 weeks, nerve repair was performed by harvesting the proximal segment of the sural nerve (n=10) or a fresh sural nerve (n=10) from the contralateral hind limb. Electrophysiological changes were analyzed to compare the fresh and denervated grafts.

Results: Electrophysiological testing demonstrated higher compound motor action potential in the denervated group compared to the fresh autograft group, however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.117).

Conclusion: The proximal segment of a chronically-denervated sural nerve can be as effective as a fresh sural nerve for autologous repair of peripheral nerve injuries in a rodent model.

Keywords: Delayed nerve repair; denervated graft; nerve autograft; proximal nerve stump.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical exposure of the sciatic (S), tibial (T), common peroneal (P), and sural (Su) nerves.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of normalized CMAP amplitude through the graft site in the right sciatic nerve.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ciaramitaro P, Mondelli M, Logullo F, Grimaldi S, Battiston B, Sard A, et al. Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: epidemiological findings, neuropathic pain and quality of life in 158 patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010;15:120–7. - PubMed
    1. Kouyoumdjian JA. Peripheral nerve injuries: a retrospective survey of 456 cases. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34:785–8. - PubMed
    1. Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45:116–22. - PubMed
    1. Bekelis K, Missios S, Spinner RJ. Falls and peripheral nerve injuries: an age-dependent relationship. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:1223–9. - PubMed
    1. Taylor CA, Braza D, Rice JB, Dillingham T. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87:381–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources