Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019;40(2):214-220.
doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1572051. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Counselor turnover in substance use disorder treatment research: Observations from one multisite trial

Affiliations

Counselor turnover in substance use disorder treatment research: Observations from one multisite trial

Mary A Hatch-Maillette et al. Subst Abus. 2019.

Abstract

Background: Counselor workforce turnover is a critical area of concern for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers and researchers. To facilitate the adoption and implementation of innovative treatments, attention must be paid to how SUD treatment workforce issues affect the implementation of clinical effectiveness research. Multiple variables have been shown to relate to turnover, yet reasons that are specific to conducting research have not been systematically assessed. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial testing a sexual risk reduction counselor training intervention, 69 counselors at 4 outpatient SUD treatment sites (2 opioid treatment programs [OTPs], 2 psychosocial) were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 training conditions (Standard vs. Enhanced). Study counselor and agency turnover rates were calculated. Agency context and policies that impacted research participation were examined. Results: Study turnover rates for enrolled counselors were substantial, ranging from 33% to 74% over approximately a 2-year active study period. Study counselor turnover was significantly greater at outpatient psychosocial programs versus OTPs. Counselor turnover did not differ due to demographic or training condition assignment. Leaving agency employment was the most typical reason for study counselor turnover. Conclusions: This secondary analysis used data from a multisite study with frontline counselors to provide a qualitative description of challenges faced when conducting effectiveness research in SUD treatment settings. That counselors may be both subjects and deliverers of the interventions studied in clinical trials, with implications for differential impact on study implementation, is highlighted. We offer suggestions for researchers seeking to implement effectiveness research in SUD clinical service settings.

Keywords: Counselor turnover; SUD treatment clinical trials; effectiveness research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2006. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19830/ doi: 10.17226/11470. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLellan AT, Carise D, Kleber HD. Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public’s demand for quality care? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003;25:117–121. - PubMed
    1. Carise D, Cornely W, Gurel MS. A successful researcher-practitioner collaboration in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003;23:157–162. - PubMed
    1. Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. A vision of the next generation of behavioral therapies research in the addictions. Addict. 2007;102:850–862. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donovan DM, Daley DC, Brigham GS, Hodgkins CC, Perl HI, Floyd AS. How practice and science are balanced and blended in the NIDA Clinical Trials Network: The bidirectional process in the development of the STAGE-12 protocol as an example. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011;37:408–416. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types