Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 1;44(15):1097-1104.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003006.

Augmented and Virtual Reality Instrument Tracking for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Study

Affiliations

Augmented and Virtual Reality Instrument Tracking for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Study

Gustav Burström et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Cadaveric animal laboratory study.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of pedicle cannulation using an augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system with automatic instrument tracking, yielding feedback of instrument position in relation to deep anatomy.

Summary of background data: Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has the possibility of reducing surgical exposure resulting in shorter hospital stays, lower blood loss and infection rates compared with open surgery but the drawback of limiting visual feedback to the surgeon regarding deep anatomy. MISS is mainly performed using image-guided 2D fluoroscopy, thus exposing the staff to ionizing radiation.

Methods: A hybrid operating room (OR) equipped with a robotic C-arm with integrated optical cameras for augmented reality instrument navigation was used. In two pig cadavers, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed, a 3D model generated, and pedicle screw insertions were planned. Seventy-eight insertions were performed. Technical accuracy was assessed on post-insertion CBCTs by measuring the distance between the navigated device and the corresponding pre-planned path as well as the angular deviations. Drilling and hammering into the pedicle were also compared. Navigation time was measured. An independent reviewer assessed a simulated clinical accuracy according to Gertzbein.

Results: The technical accuracy was 1.7 ± 1.0 mm at the bone entry point and 2.0 ± 1.3 mm at the device tip. The angular deviation was 1.7 ± 1.7° in the axial and 1.6 ± 1.2° in the sagittal plane. Navigation time per insertion was 195 ± 93 seconds. There was no difference in accuracy between hammering and drilling into the pedicle. The clinical accuracy was 97.4% to 100% depending on the screw size considered for placement. No ionizing radiation was used during navigation.

Conclusion: ARSN with instrument tracking for MISS is feasible, accurate, and radiation-free during navigation.

Level of evidence: 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phillips FM, Cheng I, Rampersaud YR, et al. Breaking through the “Glass Ceiling” of minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41 (suppl):S39–S43.
    1. Vazan M, Gempt J, Meyer B, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159:1137–1146.
    1. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, et al. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24:416–427.
    1. Lu VM, Kerezoudis P, Gilder HE, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery spinal fusion for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:E177–E185.
    1. Wu MH, Dubey NK, Li YY, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study. Spine J 2017; 17:1082–1090.

LinkOut - more resources