Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 2;10(3):174.
doi: 10.3390/mi10030174.

Finger-Actuated Microfluidic Concentration Gradient Generator Compatible with a Microplate

Affiliations

Finger-Actuated Microfluidic Concentration Gradient Generator Compatible with a Microplate

Juhwan Park et al. Micromachines (Basel). .

Abstract

The generation of concentration gradients is an essential part of a wide range of laboratory settings. However, the task usually requires tedious and repetitive steps and it is difficult to generate concentration gradients at once. Here, we present a microfluidic device that easily generates a concentration gradient by means of push-button actuated pumping units. The device is designed to generate six concentrations with a linear gradient between two different sample solutions. The microfluidic concentration gradient generator we report here does not require external pumps because changes in the pressure of the fluidic channel induced by finger actuation generate a constant volume of fluid, and the design of the generator is compatible with the commonly used 96-well microplate. Generation of a concentration gradient by the finger-actuated microfluidic device was consistent with that of the manual pipetting method. In addition, the amount of fluid dispensed from each outlet was constant when the button was pressed, and the volume of fluid increased linearly with respect to the number of pushing times. Coefficient of variation (CV) was between 0.796% and 13.539%, and the error was between 0.111% and 19.147%. The design of the microfluidic network, as well as the amount of fluid dispensed from each outlet at a single finger actuation, can be adjusted to the user's demand. To prove the applicability of the concentration gradient generator, an enzyme assay was performed using alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP). We generated a linear concentration gradient of the pNPP substrate, and the enzyme kinetics of ALP was studied by examining the initial reaction rate between ALP and pNPP. Then, a Hanes⁻Woolf plot of the various concentration of ALP was drawn and the Vmax and Km value were calculated.

Keywords: 96-well microplate; Hanes–Woolf plot; concentration gradient; enzyme kinetics; finger actuation; pneumatic valve; power-free microfluidics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design and working principle of the finger-actuated concentration gradient generator. (A) Drawing of the device design. (B) Operation principle of the pumping unit. The red dotted box in panel A indicates the single pumping unit. (C) Six concentrations with a linear gradient are generated from the device. Scale bar = 1 cm. (D) The picture of the device operation on the 96-well microplate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fabrication processes of a finger-actuated microfluidic device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimation of concentration gradient generation. (A) The optical density of the dispensed solutions from each outlet was compared between the manual pipetting method and the finger-actuated concentration gradient generator. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates. (B) The dispensed volume from each outlet was compared with respect to the number of the pushing times. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The concentration of p-nitrophenol was measured for 1 min to determine the initial reaction rate for the various enzyme concentrations. (A) 100 U/L. (B) 150 U/L. (C) 200 U/L.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The results of the enzyme kinetics study. (A) The Hanes–Woolf plot for the various concentrations of ALP. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates of the assay. (B) Vmax and Km value of each enzyme unit were obtained from the linear fitting of panel A.

References

    1. Wang X., Liu Z., Pang Y. Concentration gradient generation methods based on microfluidic systems. RSC Adv. 2017;7:29966–29984. doi: 10.1039/C7RA04494A. - DOI
    1. Kim J., Taylor D., Agrawal N., Wang H., Kim H., Han A., Rege K., Jayaraman A. A programmable microfluidic cell array for combinatorial drug screening. Lab Chip. 2012;12:1813–1822. doi: 10.1039/c2lc21202a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao D., Li H., Wang N., Lin J.-M. Evaluation of the absorption of methotrexate on cells and its cytotoxicity assay by using an integrated microfluidic device coupled to a mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2012;84:9230–9237. doi: 10.1021/ac301966c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H.S., Weiss T.L., Thapa H.R., Devarenne T.P., Han A. A microfluidic photobioreactor array demonstrating high-throughput screening for microalgal oil production. Lab Chip. 2014;14:1415–1425. doi: 10.1039/c3lc51396c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwon S., Cho C.H., Kwon Y., Lee E.S., Park J.-K. A microfluidic immunostaining system enables quality assured and standardized immunohistochemical biomarker analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45968. doi: 10.1038/srep45968. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources