Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 2;9(3):337.
doi: 10.3390/nano9030337.

Risk Analysis of Cellulose Nanomaterials by Inhalation: Current State of Science

Affiliations
Review

Risk Analysis of Cellulose Nanomaterials by Inhalation: Current State of Science

James D Ede et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Cellulose nanomaterials (CNs) are emerging advanced materials with many unique properties and growing commercial significance. A life-cycle risk assessment and environmental health and safety roadmap identified potential risks from inhalation of powdered CNs in the workplace as a key gap in our understanding of safety and recommended addressing this data gap to advance the safe and successful commercialization of these materials. Here, we (i) summarize the currently available published literature for its contribution to our current understanding of CN inhalation hazard and (ii) evaluate the quality of the studies for risk assessment purposes using published study evaluation tools for nanomaterials to assess the weight of evidence provided. Our analysis found that the quality of the available studies is generally inadequate for risk assessment purposes but is improving over time. There have been some advances in knowledge about the effects of short-term inhalation exposures of CN. The most recent in vivo studies suggest that short-term exposure to CNs results in transient inflammation, similarly to other poorly soluble, low toxicity dusts such as conventional cellulose, but is markedly different from fibers with known toxicity such as certain types of multiwalled carbon nanotubes or asbestos. However, several data gaps remain, and there is still a lack of understanding of the effects from long-term, low-dose exposures that represent realistic workplace conditions, essential for a quantitative assessment of potential health risk. Therefore, taking precautions when handling dry forms of CNs to avoid dust inhalation exposure is warranted.

Keywords: cellulose; inhalation; nanocellulose; nanomaterial; review; risk assessment; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders had no role in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic assessment of the overall quality of CN inhalation studies for risk assessment purposes based on its study design score and nanomaterial characterization score. The clear area represents a range of scores for which a study can be considered of high overall quality; conversely, the shaded area represents studies of low overall quality (adapted from Card and Magnuson, 2010 [11]).

References

    1. Shatkin J.A., Wegner T.H., Bilek E.T., Cowie J. Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products—Part 1: Applications. TAPPI J. 2014;13:9–16.
    1. Shatkin J.A., Kim B. Cellulose nanomaterials: Life cycle risk assessment, and environmental health and safety roadmap. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2015;2:477–499. doi: 10.1039/C5EN00059A. - DOI
    1. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) Poorly Soluble Particles/Lung Overload. ECETOC; Brussels, Belgium: 2013. Technical Report 122.
    1. Foster E.J., Moon R.J., Agarwal U.P., Bortner M.J., Bras J., Camarero-Espinosa S., Chan K.J., Clift M.J.D., Cranston E.D., Eichhorn S.J., et al. Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:2609–2679. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00895J. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robinson R.L.M., Lynch I., Peijnenburg W., Rumble J., Klaessig F., Marquardt C., Rauscher H., Puzyn T., Purian R., Aberg C. How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated? J. Nanoscale. 2016;8:9919–9943. doi: 10.1039/C5NR08944A. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources