Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011029.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011029.

Improving the Diagnosis of Culprit Left Circumflex Occlusion With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With a Nondiagnostic 12-Lead ECG at Presentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Improving the Diagnosis of Culprit Left Circumflex Occlusion With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With a Nondiagnostic 12-Lead ECG at Presentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Michael J Daly et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Left circumflex culprit is often missed by the standard 12-lead ECG . Extended lead systems (body surface potential map [ BSPM ]) should improve the diagnosis of culprit left circumflex stenosis with myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis of a hospital research registry (August 2000-August 2010) comprising consecutive patients with (1) ischemic-type chest pain at rest; (2) 12-lead ECG and 80-lead BSPM at first medical contact; and (3) cardiac troponin-T 12 hours after symptom onset and/or creatine kinase MB fraction, were undertaken. Enrolled in the cohort were patients with culprit left circumflex stenosis (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 0/1) at angiography. Acute myocardial infarction AMI was defined as cardiac troponin-T ≥0.1 μg/L and/or creatine kinase MB fraction >2 upper limits of normal. Enrolled were 482 patients: 168 had exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 314 (age 64±11 years; 62% male), 254 (81%) had AMI : of these, 231 had BSPM STE -sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.72, positive predictive value 0.93, negative predictive value 0.65, and c-statistic 0.803 for AMI ( P<0.001). Of those with BSPM STE and AMI (n=231), STE was most frequently detected in the posterior (n=111, 48%), lateral (n=53, 23%), inferior (n=39, 17%), and right ventricular (n=21, 9%) territories. Conclusions Among patients with 12-lead ECG non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and culprit left circumflex stenosis, initial BSPM identifies ST-segment elevation beyond the territory of the 12-lead ECG . Greater use of the BSPM may result in earlier identification of AMI , which may lead to more rapid reperfusion.

Keywords: acute coronary occlusion; acute myocardial infarction; body surface potential mapping; left circumflex artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient enrollment methodology. AMI indicates acute myocardial infarction; BSPM, body surface potential map; STEMI, ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of the 80‐lead body surface potential map electrode positions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case example (A) 12‐lead ECG showing minimal lateral territory ST‐segment sagging (V5–V6) with T‐wave inversion in lead aVL; (B) ST0 isopotential BSPM showing high right anterior and posterior STE (red maxima 1.38 mm)13; and (C) coronary angiogram showing distal LCx stenosis (red arrow). BSPM indicates body surface potential map; LCx, left circumflex artery; STE, ST‐segment elevation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case example (A) 12‐lead ECG showing 0.05 mV STD in leads V3 to V5 and T‐wave inversion in lead III and V1 to V4; (B) ST0 isopotential BSPM showing (i) anterior territory minima (blue) (−1.68 mm) and (ii) right ventricular and posterior maxima (red) (1.07 mm); and (C) coronary angiogram showing culprit occlusion of the proximal LCx, with 60% to 70% stenoses in both the distal LMS and proximal LAD. BSPM indicates body surface potential map; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex artery; LMS, left main‐stem artery; STD, ST‐segment depression.

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli‐Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. - PubMed
    1. Vogt A, von Essen R, Tebbe U, Feuerer W, Appel K‐F, Neuhaus K‐L. Impact of early perfusion status of the infarct‐related artery on short‐term mortality after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: retrospective analysis of four German multicenter studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1391–1395. - PubMed
    1. Mathew TP, Menown IB, McCarty D, Gracey H, Hill L, Adgey AAJ. Impact of pre‐hospital care in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared with those first managed in‐hospital. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:161–171. - PubMed
    1. Owens CG, McClelland AJJ, Walsh SJ, Smith BA, Tomlin A, Riddell JW, Stevenson M, Adgey AAJ. Pre‐hospital 80‐lead mapping: does it add significantly to the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes? J Electrocardiol. 2004;37(suppl):223–232. - PubMed
    1. Khan AR, Golwala H, Tripathi A, Bin Abdulhak AA, Bavishi C, Riaz H, Mallipedi V, Pandey A, Bhatt DL. Impact of total occlusion of culprit artery in acute non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3082–3089. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources