Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 25;63(5):e02543-18.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02543-18. Print 2019 May.

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Vancomycin in Large Cohorts of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Affiliations

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Vancomycin in Large Cohorts of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Tingjie Guo et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Dosing of vancomycin is often guided by therapeutic drug monitoring and population pharmacokinetic models in the intensive care unit (ICU). The validity of these models is crucial, as ICU patients have marked pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, we set out to evaluate the predictive performance of published population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in ICU patients. The PubMed database was used to search for population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in adult ICU patients. The identified models were evaluated in two independent data sets which were collected from two large hospitals in the Netherlands (Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, and OLVG Oost). We also tested a one-compartment model with fixed values for clearance and volume of distribution, in which a clinical standard dosage regimen (SDR) was mimicked to assess its predictive performance. Prediction error was calculated to assess the predictive performance of the models. Six models plus the SDR model were evaluated. The model of Roberts et al. (J. A. Roberts, F. S. Taccone, A. A. Udy, J.-L. Vincent, F. Jacobs, and J. Lipman, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2704-2709, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01708-10) performed satisfactorily, with mean and median values of prediction error of 5.1% and -7.5%, respectively, for Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, patients, and -12.6% and -17.2% respectively, for OLVG Oost patients. The other models, including the SDR model, yielded high mean values (-49.7% to 87.7%) and median values (-56.1% to 66.1%) for both populations. In conclusion, only the model of Roberts et al. was able to validly predict the concentrations of vancomycin for our data, whereas other models and standard dosing were largely inadequate. Extensive evaluation should precede the adoption of any model in clinical practice for ICU patients.

Keywords: ICU patients; NONMEM; antibiotics; model validation; population pharmacokinetics; vancomycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Box plot of the prediction error (in percent) of the evaluated models with VUmc patients (left) and OLVG patients (right). The bold solid lines within each box are the median values. The lower and upper limits of the box are the first and third quartiles. The red dashed lines are ±20% of the prediction error. SDR is the standard dosage regimen model.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Bland-Altman plot of published models based on the VUmc data set. Red dashed lines are the mean and mean ± 1.96 times the SD of the prediction error. Pred, predicted; Obs, observed.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Bland-Altman plot of published models based on the OLVG data set. Red dashed lines are the mean and mean ± 1.96 times the SD of the prediction error. Pred, predicted; Obs, observed.

References

    1. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP, Reilly C. 2009. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66:82–98. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080434. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine DP. 2006. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis 42(Suppl 1):S5–S12. doi: 10.1086/491709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, Rybak MJ, Talan DA, Chambers HF, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18–e55. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J-D, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent J-L, Angus DC. 2016. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farber BF, Moellering RC. 1983. Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 23:138–141. doi: 10.1128/AAC.23.1.138. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types