Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 26:11:1179299X19830977.
doi: 10.1177/1179299X19830977. eCollection 2019.

Urine Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer - Are We There Yet?

Affiliations
Review

Urine Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer - Are We There Yet?

Kelly Grayson et al. Biomark Cancer. .

Abstract

Ovarian cancer affects around 7500 women in the United Kingdom every year. Despite this, there is no effective screening strategy or standard treatment for ovarian cancer. If diagnosed during stage I, ovarian cancer has a 90% 5-year survival rate; however, there is usually a masking of symptoms which leads to an often late-stage diagnosis and correspondingly poor survival rate. Current diagnostic methods are invasive and consist of a pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, and blood tests to detect cancer antigen 125 (CA125). Unfortunately, surgery is often still required to make a positive diagnosis. To address the need for accurate, specific, and non-invasive diagnostic methods, there has been an increased interest in biomarkers identified through non-invasive tests as tools for the earlier diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Although most studies have focused on the identification of biomarkers in blood, the ease of availability of urine and the high patient compliance rates suggest that it could provide a promising resource for the screening of patients for ovarian cancer.

Keywords: Biomarker; diagnosis; early detection; ovarian cancer; urine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Hiom SC. Diagnosing cancer earlier: reviewing the evidence for improving cancer survival. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:S1–S5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med. 2017;14:9–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2014. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s.... Accessed 9, 2018.
    1. Gonzalez Bosquet J, Newtson AM, Chung RK, et al. Prediction of chemo-response in serous ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer. 2016;15:66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet. 2015;385:977–1010. - PMC - PubMed