Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 21:12:1756286419826547.
doi: 10.1177/1756286419826547. eCollection 2019.

Evolution of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Review

Evolution of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis

Yinan Zhang et al. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. .

Abstract

Clinical trials have advanced the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) by demonstrating the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). This review discusses major changes to MS clinical trials in the era of DMTs. As treatment options for MS continue to increase, patients in modern MS trials present earlier and with milder disease compared with historic MS populations. While placebo-controlled trials for some questions may still be relevant, DMT trials in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) are no longer ethical. The replacement of the placebo arm by an active comparator arm in trials have raised the cost of trials by requiring larger sample sizes to detect on-study changes in treatment effects. Efforts to improve trial efficiency in RRMS have focused on exploring adaptive designs and relying on sensitive magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity. In trials for progressive forms of MS (PMS), the lack of sensitive outcome measures that can be used in shorter-term trials have delayed the development of effective treatments. Recent shifting of the focus to advancing trials in PMS has identified paraclinical outcome measurements with improved potential, and the testing of agents for neuroprotection and remyelination is in progress.

Keywords: clinical trials; diagnostic criteria; multiple sclerosis; outcome measure; progressive multiple sclerosis; trial design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. De Gasperis-Brigante CD, Parker JL, O’Connor PW, et al. Reducing clinical trial risk in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 5: 81–88. - PubMed
    1. Uitdehaag BM, Barkhof F, Coyle PK, et al. The changing face of multiple sclerosis clinical trial populations. Curr Med Res Opin 2011; 27: 1529–1537. - PubMed
    1. Montalban X. Review of methodological issues of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2011; 311(Suppl. 1): S35–S42. - PubMed
    1. Inusah S, Sormani MP, Cofield SS, et al. Assessing changes in relapse rates in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 1414–1421. - PubMed
    1. Ntranos A, Lublin F. Diagnostic criteria, classification and treatment goals in multiple sclerosis: the chronicles of time and space. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016; 16: 90. - PubMed