Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986;88(3):296-300.
doi: 10.1007/BF00180827.

Effects of chronically administered d-amphetamine on spaced responding maintained under multiple and single-component schedules

Effects of chronically administered d-amphetamine on spaced responding maintained under multiple and single-component schedules

J B Smith. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986.

Abstract

Key pressing by rats was maintained under spaced-responding and random-ratio schedules of food delivery, and rates of responding were reliably different for each schedule. When responding was maintained under a multiple schedule, appropriate doses of d-amphetamine (1.0 and 1.7 mg/kg) markedly increased low rates of spaced responding while markedly decreasing high rates of ratio responding. These drug-produced changes in response rate resulted in decreased food presentation during both schedule components. When 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine was given daily, tolerance developed to initially decreased ratio responding in six to nine sessions, but did not develop to initially increased spaced responding. However, when the ratio schedule was removed, tolerance developed very quickly to increases under the spaced-responding schedule, and associated food frequency returned to control levels. When the ratio schedule was reinstated, spaced responding was once again increased, and its associated frequency of food delivery was again decreased. The development of tolerance to the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine was influenced more by global changes in response consequences during entire experimental sessions than by local changes in response consequences in single components of those sessions. Whenever the concept of "response cost" is used, it should be understood in terms of total "cost".

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):281-7 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):215-21 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;69(2):127-31 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):439-44 - PubMed
    1. Ergeb Physiol. 1968;60:1-56 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources