Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;22(8):915-926.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0483. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review

Meaghann S Weaver et al. J Palliat Med. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to report the benefits and burdens of palliative research participation on children, siblings, parents, clinicians, and researchers. Background: Pediatric palliative care requires research to mature the science and improve interventions. A tension exists between the desire to enhance palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families and the need to protect these potentially vulnerable populations from untoward burdens. Methods: Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines with prepared protocol registered as PROSPERO #CRD42018087304. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched (2000-2017). English-language studies depicting the benefits or burdens of palliative care or end-of-life research participation on either pediatric patients and/or their family members, clinicians, or study teams were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty-four studies met final inclusion criteria. The benefit or burden of palliative care research participation was reported for the child in 6 papers; siblings in 2; parents in 19; clinicians in 3; and researchers in 5 papers. Benefits were more heavily emphasized by patients and family members, whereas burdens were more prominently emphasized by researchers and clinicians. No paper utilized a validated benefit/burden scale. Discussion: The lack of published exploration into the benefits and burdens of those asked to take part in pediatric palliative care research and those conducting the research is striking. There is a need for implementation of a validated benefit/burden instrument or interview measure as part of pediatric palliative and end-of-life research design and reporting.

Keywords: benefits and burdens; palliative care research; pediatric palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Human subjects were not involved in this systematic review methodology.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Conceptual model. Conducting pediatric palliative care research requires a delicate balance of weighing the burdens and benefits in this vulnerable population. Word size and color correlate with frequency of finding.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA flow diagram depicting paper search, selection, and inclusion process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Twycross RG: Research and palliative care: The pursuit of reliable knowledge. Palliat Med 1993;7:175–177 - PubMed
    1. Crocker JC, Beecham E, Kelly P, et al. : Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: A mixed-methods examination of selection bias. Palliat Med 2015;29:231–240 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Starks H, Doorenbos A, Lindhorst T, et al. : The Family Communication Study: A randomized trial of prospective pediatric palliative care consultation, study methodology and perceptions of participation burden. Contemp Clin Trials 2016;49:15–20 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnell RH, O'Keefe M: Asking parents unaskable questions. Lancet 2004;364:737–738 - PubMed
    1. Lantos JD: Should institutional review board decisions be evidence-based? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:516–517 - PubMed

Publication types