Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;156(3):486-496.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

Validation of Predictive Metabolic Syndrome Biomarkers of World Trade Center Lung Injury: A 16-Year Longitudinal Study

Affiliations

Validation of Predictive Metabolic Syndrome Biomarkers of World Trade Center Lung Injury: A 16-Year Longitudinal Study

Sophia Kwon et al. Chest. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) predicted future development of World Trade Center lung injury (WTC-LI) in a subgroup of firefighters who never smoked and were male. An intracohort validation of MetSyn as a predictor of WTC-LI is examined in the cohort exposed to the World Trade Center (WTC) that has been followed longitudinally for 16 years.

Methods: Results of pulmonary function tests (n = 98,221) in workers exposed to the WTC (n = 9,566) were evaluated. A baseline cohort of firefighters who had normal FEV1 before 9/11 and who had had serum drawn before site closure on July 24, 2002 (n = 7,487) was investigated. Case subjects with WTC-LI (n = 1,208) were identified if they had at least two measured instances of FEV1 less than the lower limit of normal (LLN). Cox proportional hazards modeled early MetSyn biomarker ability to predict development of FEV1 less than the LLN.

Results: Case subjects were more likely to smoke, be highly exposed, and have MetSyn. There was a significant exposure dose response; the individuals most highly exposed had a 30.1% increased risk of developing WTC-LI, having MetSyn increased risk of developing WTC-LI by 55.7%, and smoking increased risk by 15.2%. There was significant interaction between smoking and exposure.

Conclusions: We validated the usefulness of MetSyn to predict future WTC-LI in a larger population of individuals who were exposed. MetSyn defined by dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease suggests that systemic inflammation can contribute to future lung function loss.

Keywords: World Trade Center; lung injury; metabolic syndrome; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Fire Department of New York rescue and recovery workers exposed to World Trade Center particulates. LLN = lower limit of normal; WTC = World Trade Center; WTC-LI = WTC lung injury.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MetSyn final model hazard ratios. The final model was adjusted for age at 9/11, smoking, and exposure. The final model had a significant exposure dose response (P = .007). There was also a significant increased risk associated with the number of MetSyn criteria met in a dose-response fashion (P < .001). MetSyn = metabolic syndrome. See Figure 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, Kaplan-Meier curve shows MetSyn criteria stratified time to development of WTC-LI. Cumulative disease-free survival is expressed on the y-axis and time in years from their WTC exposure is on the x-axis. B, A 3-D density plot of hazard ratio and number of MetSyn criteria met demonstrates a large proportion of patients with zero MetSyn criteria with hazards < 1, in contrast to those with three or more MetSyn criteria who had more significant risk of developing WTC-LI. See Figure 1 and 2 legends for expansion of abbreviations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative disease-free survival curves by individual metabolic syndrome biomarkers. Cumulative disease-free survival is expressed on the y-axis, and time in years from World Trade Center exposure is on the x-axis. A, High-density lipoprotein (HDL) (mg/dL). B, Triglycerides (Trig) (mg/dL). C, BMI (kg/m2). D, Systolic BP (mm Hg). E, Diastolic BP (mm Hg). F, Smoking status. G, Arrival time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grundy S.M., Cleeman J.I., Daniels S.R. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–2752. - PubMed
    1. Aguilar M., Bhuket T., Torres S., Liu B., Wong R.J. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012. JAMA. 2015;313(19):1973–1974. - PubMed
    1. Wallwork R.S., Colicino E., Zhong J. Ambient fine particulate matter, outdoor temperature, and risk of metabolic syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(1):30–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brook R.D., Sun Z., Brook J.R. Extreme air pollution conditions adversely affect blood pressure and insulin resistance: the Air Pollution and Cardiometabolic Disease Study. Hypertension. 2016;67(1):77–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leone N., Courbon D., Thomas F. Lung function impairment and metabolic syndrome: the critical role of abdominal obesity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(6):509–516. - PubMed

Publication types