Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 4;24(5):898.
doi: 10.3390/molecules24050898.

Glucosylation and Glutathione Conjugation of Chlorpyrifos and Fluopyram Metabolites Using Electrochemistry/Mass Spectrometry

Affiliations

Glucosylation and Glutathione Conjugation of Chlorpyrifos and Fluopyram Metabolites Using Electrochemistry/Mass Spectrometry

Tessema Fenta Mekonnen et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Xenobiotics and their reactive metabolites are conjugated with native biomolecules such as glutathione and glucoside during phase II metabolism. Toxic metabolites are usually detoxified during this step. On the other hand, these reactive species have a potential health impact by disrupting many enzymatic functions. Thus, it is crucial to understand phase II conjugation reactions of xenobiotics in order to address their fate and possible toxicity mechanisms. Additionally, conventional methods (in vivo and in vitro) have limitation due to matrix complexity and time-consuming. Hence, developing fast and matrix-free alternative method is highly demandable. In this work, oxidative phase I metabolites and reactive species of chlorpyrifos (insecticide) and fluopyram (fungicide) were electrochemically produced by using a boron-doped diamond electrode coupled online to electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Reactive species of the substrates were trapped by biomolecules (glutathione and glucoside) and phase II conjugative metabolites were identified using liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS, and/or Triple time of flight (TripleTOF)-MS. Glutathione conjugates and glucosylation of chlorpyrifos, trichloropyridinol, oxon, and monohydroxyl fluopyram were identified successfully. Glutathione and glucoside were conjugated with chlorpyrifos, trichloropyridinol, and oxon by losing a neutral HCl. In the case of fluopyram, its monohydroxyl metabolite was actively conjugated with both glutathione and glucoside. In summary, seven bioconjugates of CPF and its metabolites and two bioconjugates of fluopyram metabolites were identified using electrochemistry (EC)/MS for the first time in this work. The work could be used as an alternative approach to identify glutathione and glucosylation conjugation reactions of other organic compounds too. It is important, especially to predict phase II conjugation within a short time and matrix-free environment.

Keywords: EC/MS; bioconjugation; glucosylation; glutathione; oxidative metabolism; pesticide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mass voltammograms of CPF (1800→2300 mV, 10 mV/s) and GSH (0 mV) (a) and intensity of possible conjugates (b) measured by EC/MS using BDD in µPrepCellTM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of GSH and CPF oxidative products in the control (black), in 2100 mV DC potential (red), and in RLM incubates (blue) (a), and extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of bioconjugates at 2100 mV DC potential (b) using BDD WE recorded by LC-MS/MS on (+) ESI.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mass spectra of product ion m/z 314 from C3 in MS3 (a) and C6 with its suggested fragmentation measured in MS2 (b) using LC-QTRAP MS/MS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed molecular structures of GSH-conjugates with CPF oxidative products.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mass voltammograms of CPF oxidative products and Glc after scanning in 1800–2100 mV using EC/MS equipped with BDD WE (a) and EIC chromatograms with and without applied potentials measured by LC-MS/MS (b).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Proposed structures of CPF TPs glucosylation products in online EC/MS.
Figure 7
Figure 7
EIC of FLP oxidative products effluent incubated with GSH (a) or n-Glc (b), and peak area ratios of selected conjugates shown at different applied potentials (c), measured by LC-MS/MS on (+) ESI.
Figure 8
Figure 8
GSH (C10) and glucoside (C11) conjugates of monohydroxyl FLP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zabaleta I., Bizkarguenaga E., Nunoo D.B.O., Schultes L., Leonel J., Prieto A., Zuloaga O., Benskin J.P. Biodegradation and uptake of the pesticide sulfluramid in a soil-carrot mesocosm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:2603–2611. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03876. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Von Gunten U. Oxidation processes in water treatment: Are we on track? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:5062–5075. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macherey A.-C., Dansette P.M. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. 5th ed. Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 2015. Chapter 25—Biotransformations leading to toxic metabolites: Chemical aspects; pp. 585–614.
    1. Masubuchi Y., Horie T. Toxicological significance of mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome p450 enzymes by drugs. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2007;37:389–412. doi: 10.1080/10408440701215233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zanger U.M., Schwab M. Cytochrome p450 enzymes in drug metabolism: Regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;138:103–141. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources