Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 14:10:313.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00313. eCollection 2019.

Eliciting Big Data From Small, Young, or Non-standard Languages: 10 Experimental Challenges

Affiliations

Eliciting Big Data From Small, Young, or Non-standard Languages: 10 Experimental Challenges

Evelina Leivada et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The aim of this work is to identify and analyze a set of challenges that are likely to be encountered when one embarks on fieldwork in linguistic communities that feature small, young, and/or non-standard languages with a goal to elicit big sets of rich data. For each challenge, we (i) explain its nature and implications, (ii) offer one or more examples of how it is manifested in actual linguistic communities, and (iii) where possible, offer recommendations for addressing it effectively. Our list of challenges involves static characteristics (e.g., absence of orthographic conventions and how it affects data collection), dynamic processes (e.g., speed of language change in small languages and how it affects longitudinal collection of big amounts of data), and interactive relations between non-dynamic features that are nevertheless subject to potentially rapid change (e.g., absence of standardized assessment tools or estimates for psycholinguistic variables). The identified challenges represent the domains of data collection and handling, participant recruitment, and experimental design. Among other issues, we discuss population limits and degree of power, inter- and intraspeaker variation, absence of metalanguage and its implications for the process of eliciting acceptability judgments, and challenges that arise from absence of local funding, conflicting regulations in relation to privacy issues, and exporting large samples of data across countries. Finally, the ten experimental challenges presented are relevant to languages from a broad typological spectrum, encompassing both spoken and sign, extant and nearly extinct languages.

Keywords: big data; dialect; experimental design; fieldwork; rich data; sign language.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aboh E., DeGraff M. (2017). “A null theory of creole formation based on universal grammar,” in The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, ed. Roberts I. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 401–458.
    1. Aboh E. O. (2015). The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars. Language Contact and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 10.1017/CBO9781139024167 - DOI
    1. Adams V., Miller S., Craig S., Droyoung S. N., Varner M., et al. (2008). Informed consent in cross-cultural perspective: clinical research in the tibetan autonomous region, PRC. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 31 445–472. 10.1007/s11013-007-9070-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adger D. (2006). Combinatorial Variability. J. Linguist. 42 503–530. 10.1017/S002222670600418X - DOI
    1. Adger D. (2016). “Language variability in syntactic theory,” in Rethinking Parameters, eds Eguren L., Fernández-Soriano O., Mendikoetxea A. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 49–63.

LinkOut - more resources