A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of trifluridine/tipiracil and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: LUPIN study
- PMID: 30838483
- DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00749-9
A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of trifluridine/tipiracil and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: LUPIN study
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of reintroducing oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to both oxaliplatin and irinotecan was previously reported in a phase II study (RE-OPEN). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with refractory mCRC. Patients and Methods Three dosages of intravenous oxaliplatin (50, 65 and 85 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and a fixed dose of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily (bid) on days 1-5 and 15-19 every 4 weeks were investigated in patients with refractory mCRC using a 3 + 3 design. Eligible patients had received prior oxaliplatin-based treatment that achieved a response or stable disease followed by confirmed disease progression at least 6 months before entering the study. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Three of six patients in the oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 cohort had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with treatment delays during the second cycle at ≥8 days due to grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or grade 2 AST/ALT increased. No DLTs were observed in the other cohorts. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), anorexia (n = 1), and nausea (n = 1). There was no evidence of allergic reaction to oxaliplatin or severe peripheral sensory neuropathy. Conclusions A combination of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 bid on days 1-5 and 15-19 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks could be a suitable regimen for the recommended dose of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin in patients with refractory mCRC.
Keywords: DLT; DNA damage; FTD/TPI; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Oxaliplatin.
References
-
- Hong DS, Abbruzzese JL, Bogaard K, Lassere Y, Fukushima M, Mita A, Kuwata K, Hoff PM (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107:1383–1390 - DOI
-
- Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, Yoshino T, Garcia-Carbonero R, Mizunuma N et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1909–1919 - DOI
-
- NCCN. Clinical practice guideline: Colon cancer. Ver. 4. 2018. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf . Accessed 27 Dec 2018
-
- Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D et al (2016) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 27:1386–1422 - DOI
-
- Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, Pentheroudakis G, Yamazaki K, Xu RH et al (2018) Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol 29:44–70 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous