Automatic biases in intertemporal choice
- PMID: 30838528
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01579-9
Automatic biases in intertemporal choice
Abstract
Dual process theories of intertemporal decision making propose that decision makers automatically favor immediate rewards. In this paper, we use a drift diffusion model to implement these theories, and empirically investigate the role of their proposed automatic biases. Our model permits automatic biases in the response process, in the form of a shifted starting point, as well as automatic biases in the evaluation process, in the form of an additive drift rate intercept. We fit our model to individual-level choice and response time data, and find that automatic biases (as measured though the starting point and drift rate intercept in our model) are prevalent in intertemporal choice, but that the type, magnitude, and direction of these biases vary greatly across individuals. Our results pose new challenges for theories of intertemporal choice behavior.
Keywords: Automatic bias; Computational modelling; Drift diffusion model; Dual process theories; Intertemporal choice.
Similar articles
-
A Dynamic Dual Process Model of Intertemporal Choice.Span J Psychol. 2019 Dec 23;22:E54. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.53. Span J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31868160
-
A framework for understanding and advancing intertemporal choice research using rodent models.Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Mar;139:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 5. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017. PMID: 28065715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter-individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3597-611. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4427-1. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26341932
-
Pre-supplementary motor area strengthens reward sensitivity in intertemporal choice.Neuroimage. 2024 Oct 1;299:120838. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120838. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Neuroimage. 2024. PMID: 39241899
-
Social choice for one: On the rationality of intertemporal decisions.Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 23. Behav Processes. 2016. PMID: 27118422 Review.
Cited by
-
Deliberating trade-offs with the future.Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar;4(3):238-247. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9. Epub 2020 Mar 17. Nat Hum Behav. 2020. PMID: 32184495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measuring utility with diffusion models.Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 25;9(34):eadf1665. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf1665. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Sci Adv. 2023. PMID: 37611107 Free PMC article.
-
Deliberation during online bargaining reveals strategic information.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2410956122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410956122. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025. PMID: 39937849 Free PMC article.
-
Losing control without your smartphone: Anxiety affects the dynamic choice process of impulsive decision-making and purchase.Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 16;17:998017. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.998017. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37008213 Free PMC article.
-
The art of the deal: Deciphering the endowment effect from traders' eyes.Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 25;9(34):eadf2115. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf2115. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Sci Adv. 2023. PMID: 37611109 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources