Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;46(7):429-433.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000993.

Evaluation of a Rapid Syphilis Test in an Emergency Department Setting in Detroit, Michigan

Affiliations

Evaluation of a Rapid Syphilis Test in an Emergency Department Setting in Detroit, Michigan

Yetunde F Fakile et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Syphilis transmission can be prevented by prompt diagnosis and treatment of primary and secondary infection. We evaluated the performance of a point-of-care rapid syphilis treponemal (RST) test in an emergency department (ED) setting.

Methods: Between June 2015 and April 2016, men aged 18 to 34 years seeking services in a Detroit ED, and with no history of syphilis, were screened for syphilis with the RST test, rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA). A positive reference standard was both a reactive RPR and a reactive TP-PA. We compared test results in self-reported men who have sex with men (MSM) to non-MSM.

Results: Among 965 participants, 10.9% of RST tests were reactive in MSM and only 1.5% in non-MSM (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of the RST test was 76.9% and specificity was 99.0% (positive predictive value, 50.0%) compared with the positive reference standard. Three discordant specimens found negative with the RST test but positive with the reference standard had an RPR titer of 1:1, compared with 10 specimens with concordant positive results that had a median RPR titer of 1:16. The RST sensitivity was 50.0% (positive predictive value, 68.4%) compared to the TP-PA test alone. Among men seeking care in an ED, the RST detected 76.9% of participants with a reactive RPR and TP-PA.

Conclusions: The RST test detected all of the participants with an RPR titer ≥1:2 but less than 20% of participants with a positive TP-PA and negative RPR. The RST test was useful to detect a high proportion of participants with an active syphilis in an urban ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The Syphilis Health Check kits were donated by the Trinity Biotech Company.

References

    1. Radolf JD, Tramont EC, Salazar JC. Syphilis (Treponema pallidum). In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Updated Edition, 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2015.
    1. Lynn WA, Lightman S. Syphilis and HIV: A dangerous combination. Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4:456–466. - PubMed
    1. Centers, for Disease Control. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2016. US Department of Health and Human Services 2017.
    1. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ham DC, Lentine D, Hoover KW, et al. Strengthening sexually transmitted disease Services in Detroit, Michigan: A call to action. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43:65–66. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms