Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Feb;57(1):27-31.
doi: 10.3347/kjp.2019.57.1.27. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Comparison of Two PCR Assays for Trichomonas vaginalis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Two PCR Assays for Trichomonas vaginalis

Chang-Suk Noh et al. Korean J Parasitol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

PCR is known to be the most sensitive method for diagnosing Trichomonas vaginalis infections. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of a PCR assay for trichomoniasis (HY-PCR) developed in Hanyang University with the use of a Seeplex Ace Detection Kit®, using urine collected from four Korean men with prostatic disease. Overall, HY-PCR was more sensitive than the Seeplex Kit. The use of Chelex 100 is recommended for DNA isolation in order to increase the sensitivity of the PCR test.

Keywords: DNA isolation; PCR; Trichomonas vaginalis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We have no conflict of interest related with this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sensitivity of HY-PCR tested with varying numbers of trophozoites (1, 10, 100) of T. vaginalis. (A) Chelex® 100, (B) QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit were used for DNA extraction. The PCR product formed a 318 bp band. N, Negative control (DW); 1, 10, 100, number of trichomonads used.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison between Chelex® 100 (A) and QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (B) as DNA extraction methods for PCR using a Seeplex® ACE Detection Kit. T. vaginalis trophozoites (1, 10, 100) were added to the urine of a normal male and incubated overnight before DNA extraction. N, negative control (DW); M, marker; arrowhead, T. vaginalis product.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Two PCR assay systems were used with DNA isolated from the urine of the 4 patients by 2 DNA extraction methods. (A) All 4 urine samples gave positive bands in HY-PCR using DNA extracted with Chelex®100. (B, C) PCR with Seeplex® ACE Detection Kit. (B) Only one of the 4 samples gave a positive band with DNA isolated with Chelex® 100, and (C) none gave positive band with DNA extracted with QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit. Arrowhead, T. vaginalis.

References

    1. Bouchemal K, Bories C, Loiseau PM. Strategies for prevention and treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:811–825. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fichorova RN. Impact of T. vaginalis infection on innate immune responses and reproductive outcome. J Reprod Immunol. 2009;83:185–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moodley D, Sartorius B, Madurai S, Chetty V, Maman S. Pregnancy outcomes in association with STDs including genital HSV-2 shedding in a South African cohort study. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93:460–466. - PubMed
    1. Mercer F, Johnson PJ. Trichomonas vaginalis: Pathogenesis, symbiont interactions, and host cell immune responses. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:683–693. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mukanyangezi MF, Sengpiel V, Manzi O, Tobin G, Rulisa S, Bienvenu E, Giglio D. Screening for human papillomavirus, cervical cytological abnormalities and associated risk factors in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in Rwanda. HIV Med. 2018;19:152–166. - PubMed

MeSH terms