Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 5;11(3):311.
doi: 10.3390/cancers11030311.

Oncogenic Deregulation of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Leukemia

Affiliations
Review

Oncogenic Deregulation of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Leukemia

Roland Windisch et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Numerous cell⁻cell and cell⁻matrix interactions within the bone marrow microenvironment enable the controlled lifelong self-renewal and progeny of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). On the cellular level, this highly mutual interaction is granted by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) integrating differentiation, proliferation, and pro-survival signals from the surrounding microenvironment to the inner cell. However, cell⁻cell and cell⁻matrix interactions are also critically involved during malignant transformation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. It has become increasingly apparent that leukemia-associated gene products, such as activated tyrosine kinases and fusion proteins resulting from chromosomal translocations, directly regulate the activation status of adhesion molecules, thereby directing the leukemic phenotype. These observations imply that interference with adhesion molecule function represents a promising treatment strategy to target pre-leukemic and leukemic lesions within the bone marrow niche. Focusing on myeloid leukemia, we provide a current overview of the mechanisms by which leukemogenic gene products hijack control of cellular adhesion to subsequently disturb normal hematopoiesis and promote leukemia development.

Keywords: CAM; adhesion; integrin; leukemia; oncogene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural and functional properties of the four major cell adhesion molecule families.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adhesion molecule-mediated cell–cell interactions in the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are able to assemble homotypic and heterotypic cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions (red arrows), via cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), such as VLA-4, VLA-5 and LFA-1, thereby regulating proliferation, self-renewal and differentiation. tpx, transplantation; rhG-CSF, recombinant human G-CSF.
Figure 3
Figure 3
RUNX1/ETO-induced CAM signature within the bone marrow microenvironment. The cell adhesion molecules PSGL-1, LFA-1, CD44, and VLA-4 have been described as target genes directly regulated by RUNX1/ETO [100,104,105,107]. Neutrophil elastase (NE) has been described as a RUNX1/ETO-repressed target gene [114].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Described and hypothesized mechanisms of oncogenic interference with adhesion molecule function. (A) Transcriptional deregulation of adhesion molecule expression by aberrant transcription factors (e.g., RUNX1/ETO [100] or TAL1) [51]. (B) Interference with cellular destruction of adhesion molecules through proteasomal degradation. (C) Activation of integrin receptors by co-receptors (e.g., the SDF1α/CXCR4/VLA4 axis) and modulators thereof (e.g., CEBPα) [89]. (D) Interference with the composition of the adhesion molecule complex. (E) Superactivation of pre-activated adhesion molecule signaling pathways (e.g., by receptor tyrosine kinases) [73]. ITG, integrin; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parsons J.T., Horwitz A.R., Schwartz M.A. Cell adhesion: Integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:633–643. doi: 10.1038/nrm2957. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prakasam A.K., Maruthamuthu V., Leckband D.E. Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:15434–15439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606701103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Roy F. Beyond E-cadherin: Roles of other cadherin superfamily members in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:121–134. doi: 10.1038/nrc3647. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang C.C., Yan Z., Zhang Q., Kuszpit K., Zasadny K., Qiu M., Painter C.L., Wong A., Kraynov E., Arango M.E., et al. PF-03732010: A fully human monoclonal antibody against P-cadherin with antitumor and antimetastatic activity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;16:5177–5188. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aggerholm A., Holm M.S., Guldberg P., Olesen L.H., Hokland P. Promoter hypermethylation of p15INK4B, HIC1, CDH1, and ER is frequent in myelodysplastic syndrome and predicts poor prognosis in early-stage patients. Eur. J. Haematol. 2006;76:23–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00559.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources