Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 6;16(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s12976-019-0101-9.

Mathematical modeling of septic shock based on clinical data

Affiliations

Mathematical modeling of septic shock based on clinical data

Yukihiro Yamanaka et al. Theor Biol Med Model. .

Abstract

Background: Mathematical models of diseases may provide a unified approach for establishing effective treatment strategies based on fundamental pathophysiology. However, models that are useful for clinical practice must overcome the massive complexity of human physiology and the diversity of patients' environmental conditions. With the aim of modeling a complex disease, we choose sepsis, which is highly complex, life-threatening systemic disease with high mortality. In particular, we focused on septic shock, a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality. Our model includes cardiovascular, immune, nervous system models and a pharmacological model as submodels and integrates them to create a sepsis model based on pathological facts.

Results: Model validation was done in two steps. First, we established a model for a standard patient in order to confirm the validity of our approach in general aspects. For this, we checked the correspondence between the severity of infection defined in terms of pathogen growth rate and the ease of recovery defined in terms of the intensity of treatment required for recovery. The simulations for a standard patient showed good correspondence. We then applied the same simulations to a patient with heart failure as an underlying disease. The model showed that spontaneous recovery would not occur without treatment, even for a very mild infection. This is consistent with clinical experience. We next validated the model using clinical data of three sepsis patients. The model parameters were tuned for these patients based on the model for the standard patient used in the first part of the validation. In these cases, the simulations agreed well with clinical data. In fact, only a handful parameters need to be tuned for the simulations to match with the data.

Conclusions: We have constructed a model of septic shock and have shown that it can reproduce well the time courses of treatment and disease progression. Tuning of model parameters for each patient could be easily done. This study demonstrates the feasibility of disease models, suggesting the possibility of clinical use in the prediction of disease progression, decisions on the timing of drug dosages, and the estimation of time of infection.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Immune system; Inflammation; Model-based therapy; Septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol in this paper was approved by the Waseda University Ethics Review Committee on research with human subjects (No. 2016–086) and the Tokyo Women’s Medical University Institutional Review Board (No. 4276), and the need for patient consent was waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the sepsis model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cardiovascular system model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overview of the immune system model [16]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Experimental results of the effects of noradrenaline on mean arterial pressure. [27]
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Noradrenaline effect model (dose-response curve)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Parameter classification
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
(a) Patient with a mild infection (kpg = 0.2). (b) Patient with a moderate infection (kpg = 0.45). (c) Patient with a severe infection (kpg = 1.50). Time courses of sepsis development
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
(a) Mild infection with heart failure. (b) Moderate infection with heart failure. (c) Severe infection with heart failure. Time courses of sepsis development in patients with heart failure
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Clinical data for patient 1
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Clinical data for patient 2
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Clinical data for patient 3
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Comparison of the simulation results and clinical data for patient 1
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Simulation results after fnoise was introduced
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Comparison of the simulated and clinical data after fnoise was introduced
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Comparison of the simulation results and clinical data for patient 2
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
Comparison of the simulation results and clinical data for patient 3

References

    1. Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley E, Jimenez E, Mohan A, Khan RA, Whittle J, Jacobs E, Nanchal R. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007) Chest. 2011;140(5):1223–1231. - PubMed
    1. The World Sepsis Day Fact Sheet. 2013. https://www.uclahealth.org/sepsis/workfiles/Pediatrics/2017_WSD_Declarat....
    1. Singer, M., Deutschman, C. Et.al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). J of American Medical Association 2016;315(8), 801–810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng SC, et al. broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:406–413. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Schorr AS, Levy MM. A users’ guide to the 2016 surviving Sepsis guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:299–303. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources