Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e024681.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024681.

A transformative translational change programme to introduce genomics into healthcare: a complexity and implementation science study protocol

Natalie Taylor  1   2   3 , Stephanie Best  2   4 , Melissa Martyn  5   6   7 , Janet C Long  2 , Kathryn N North  4   6 , Jeffrey Braithwaite  2   4 , Clara Gaff  5   7
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A transformative translational change programme to introduce genomics into healthcare: a complexity and implementation science study protocol

Natalie Taylor et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Translating scientific advances in genomic medicine into evidence-based clinical practice is challenging. Studying the natural translation of genomics into 'early-adopting' health system sectors is essential. We will (a) examine 29 health systems (Australian and Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance flagships) integrating genomics into practice and (b) combine this learning to co-design and test an evidence-based generalisable toolkit for translating genomics into healthcare.

Methods and analysis: Twenty-nine flagships integrating genomics into clinical settings are studied as complex adaptive systems to understand emergent and self-organising behaviours among inter-related actors and processes. The Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid approach is applied to gather information on the delivery and potential for real-world implementation. Stages '1' and '2a' (representing hybrid model 1) are the focus of this protocol. The Translation Science to Population Impact (TSci Impact) framework is used to study policy decisions and service provision, and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is used to understand individual level behavioural change; both frameworks are applied across stages 1 and 2a. Stage 1 synthesises interview data from 32 participants involved in developing the genomics clinical practice systems and approaches across five 'demonstration-phase' (early adopter) flagships. In stage 2a, stakeholders are providing quantitative and qualitative data on process mapping, clinical audits, uptake and sustainability (TSci Impact), and psychosocial and environmental determinants of change (TDF). Findings will be synthesised before codesigning an intervention toolkit to facilitate implementation of genomic testing. Study methods to simultaneously test the comparative effectiveness of genomic testing and the implementation toolkit (stage 2b), and the refined implementation toolkit while simply observing the genomics intervention (stage 3) are summarised.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted. The results will be disseminated in academic forums and used to refine interventions to translate genomics evidence into healthcare. Non-traditional academic dissemination methods (eg, change in guidelines or government policy) will also be employed.

Keywords: behaviour change; complexity; genomics; implementation; sustainability; translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Implementation research plan. AYA, adult and young adolescent; RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frameworks to manage complexity. TDF, Theoretical Domains Framework; TSci Impact, Translational Science to Population Impact.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Logic model. TDF, Theoretical Domains Framework.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Process mapping guide.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Service provision interview translation phases graphic.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. Welcome to the genomic era. N Engl J Med 2003;349:996–8. 10.1056/NEJMe038132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khoury MJ. No shortcuts on the long road to evidence-based genomic medicine. JAMA 2017;318:27–8. 10.1001/jama.2017.6315 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts MC, Kennedy AE, Chambers DA, et al. The current state of implementation science in genomic medicine: opportunities for improvement. Genet Med 2017;19:858 10.1038/gim.2016.210 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, et al. Reality check for checklists. Lancet 2009;374:444–5. - PubMed
    1. Ovretveit JC, Shekelle PG, Dy SM, et al. How does context affect interventions to improve patient safety? An assessment of evidence from studies of five patient safety practices and proposals for research. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:604–10. 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047035 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms