Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 7;17(2):eGS4414.
doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2019GS4414.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone, docetaxel or placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abiraterone, docetaxel or placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Pedro Nazareth Aguiar Jr et al. Einstein (Sao Paulo). .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chemotherapy or abiraterone to androgen deprivation.

Methods: We developed an analytical model to determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone versus androgen deprivation therapy alone. Direct and indirect costs were included in the model. The effects were expressed in Quality-Adjusted Life Years adjusted for side effects.

Results: Compared to androgen deprivation therapy alone, the addition of chemotherapy and of abiraterone generated 0.492 and 0.999, respectively, in Quality-Adjusted Life Years. Abiraterone led to a Quality-Adjusted Life Years gain of 0.506 compared to docetaxel. The incremental costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Years were R$ 133.649,22 for docetaxel, R$ 330.828,70 for abiraterone and R$ 571.379,42 for abiraterone compared to docetaxel, respectively.

Conclusion: The addition of chemotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy is more cost-effective than the addition of abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy. However, discounts on abiraterone cost might improve cost-effectiveness.

Objetivo: Avaliar a relação custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia ou abiraterona à terapia de privação hormonal.

Métodos: Um modelo analítico foi desenvolvido para determinar a relação custo-efetividade da adição de docetaxel ou abiraterona comparada à terapia de privação hormonal isolada. Custos diretos e indiretos foram incluídos no modelo. Os efeitos foram expressos em Anos de Vida Ajustados para Qualidade corrigidos pelos efeitos colaterais de cada terapia.

Resultados: A adição de quimioterapia e de abiraterona à terapia de privação hormonal aumentou os Anos de Vida Ajustados para Qualidade em 0,492 e 0,999, respectivamente, em comparação à terapia de privação hormonal isolada. A abiraterona promoveu ganho de Anos de Vida Ajustados para Qualidade de 0,506 em relação ao docetaxel. O custo incremental por Anos de Vida Ajustados para Qualidade foi R$ 133.649,22 para o docetaxel, R$ 330.828,70 para a abiraterona e R$ 571.379,42 para a abiraterona comparada ao docetaxel.

Conclusão: A adição de quimioterapia à terapia de privação hormonal é mais custo-efetiva que a adição de abiraterona à terapia de privação hormonal. Contudo, descontos no custo da abiraterona poderiam tornar esse tratamento mais custo-efetivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Analytic model of decision
Figure 2
Figure 2. Survival estimates free of failure and overall survival. (A) Failure-free survival exponential estimative. (B) Overall survival exponential estimative
Figure 3
Figure 3. Tornado diagram for abiraterone plus androgen deprivation therapy or docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy versus androgen deprivation therapy alone
Figure 4
Figure 4. Tornado diagram for abiraterone plus androgen deprivation therapy versus docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy
Figure 5
Figure 5. Probability of being cost-effective

References

    1. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância Estimativa 2016: incidência de câncer no Brasil. 2016. [citado 2018 Jun 21]. Internet. https://www.inca.gov.br/campanhas/dia-nacional-de-combate-ao-cancer/2015....
    1. Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, Liu G, Jarrad DF, Eisenberger M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):737–746. - PMC - PubMed
    1. James ND, Sydes MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, Spears MR, Ritchie AW, Parker CC, Russell JM, Attard G, Bono J, Cross W, Jones RJ, Thalmann G, Amos C, Matheson D, Millman R, Alzouebi M, Beesley S, Birtle AJ, Brock S, Cathomas R, Chakraborti P, Chowdhury S, Cook A, Elliott T, Gale J, Gibbs S, Graham JD, Hetherington J, Hughes R, Laing R, McKinna F, McLaren DB, O’Sullivan JM, Parikh O, Peedell C, Protheroe A, Robinson AJ, Srihari N, Srinivasan R, Staffurth J, Sundar S, Tolan S, Tsang D, Wagstaff J, Parmar MK, STAMPEDE investigator Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10024):1163–1177. - PMC - PubMed
    1. James ND, Bono JS, Spears MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. 33851N Engl J Med. 2017;377 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, Özgüroğlu M, Ye D, Feyerabend S, Protheroe A, De Porre P, Kheoh T, Park YC, Todd MB, Chi KN, LATITUDE Investigators Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):352–360. - PubMed

MeSH terms