Important methodological flaws in the recently published clinical prediction model the REMEMBER score
- PMID: 30845996
- PMCID: PMC6407253
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2363-3
Important methodological flaws in the recently published clinical prediction model the REMEMBER score
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Comment on
-
Predicting mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO after coronary artery bypass grafting: the REMEMBER score.Crit Care. 2019 Jan 11;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2307-y. Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 30635022 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Labarère J, Bertrand R, Fine MJ. How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014. 10.1007/s00134-014-3227-6. - PubMed
-
- Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Agoritsas T, Gayet-Ageron A, Perneger TV. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.012. - PubMed
-
- Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015. 10.1136/bmj.g7594. - PubMed
-
- Schellongowski P, Combes A, Møller MH. Focus on extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med. 2018. 10.1007/s00134-018-5465-5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
