Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 7;21(4):25.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1105-0.

Physiology-Guided Management of Serial/Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations
Review

Physiology-Guided Management of Serial/Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

Christopher S G Murray et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Just over four decades ago, the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) witnessed a major breakthrough with the advent of minimally invasive treatment modalities like angioplasty followed by coronary stenting. Dr. Andreas Gruentzig pioneered this field in 1977 by adding a balloon to the Dotter catheter. From its inception, he was cognizant of the need for measuring pressures before and after balloon inflation in the treated coronary artery, device placement in the treated coronary artery. However, for decades subsequently, emphasis was placed primarily on preprocedural non-invasive tests and angiographic assessment of lesions based on percent diameter stenosis to guide therapeutic interventions. We review the progress of these physiologic advancements in management over the last 20 years, as well as the current state and prospects for the future.

Recent findings: More recently, clinical features heavily drive the decision whether or not to stent the diseased segment. A little more than two decades ago, a new approach to facilitate the decision whether or not to intervene on intermediate stenoses began to evolve. It became clear that other features besides angiography are important when considering benefit of mechanical intervention. The emphasis shifted to assessment of the physiological significance of coronary lesions, rather than solely anatomical identification of lesions at angiography. Physiological assessments have served to better discriminate potentially flow-limiting lesions, utilizing cutoff measurements to determine which patients would benefit from intervention in addition to medical therapy. We have found that there is still need for arrival at a consensus as regards the best practice in the context of physiological assessment of serial stenotic lesions, but that studies do show that techniques currently available are non-inferior to each other, and highly effective.

Keywords: Flow physiology; Fractional flow reserve; Instantaneous wave-free ratio; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Revascularization; Serial coronary lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 8;63(13):1253-1261 - PubMed
    1. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1018-1027 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2000 Nov 7;102(19):2371-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2002 Jun 25;105(25):2950-4 - PubMed
    1. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(6):824-833 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources