Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;107(8):2579-2595.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34348. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

3D printed polymer-mineral composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Fabrication and characterization

Affiliations
Review

3D printed polymer-mineral composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Fabrication and characterization

Joanna Babilotte et al. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Applications in additive manufacturing technologies for bone tissue engineering applications requires the development of new biomaterials formulations. Different three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies can be used and polymers are commonly employed to fabricate 3D printed bone scaffolds. However, these materials used alone do not possess an effective osteopromotive potential for bone regeneration. A growing number of studies report the combination of polymers with minerals in order to improve their bioactivity. This review exposes the state-of-the-art of existing 3D printed composite biomaterials combining polymers and minerals for bone tissue engineering. Characterization techniques to assess scaffold properties are also discussed. Several parameters must be considered to fabricate a 3D printed material for bone repair (3D printing method, type of polymer/mineral combination and ratio) because all of them affect final properties of the material. Each polymer and mineral has its own advantages and drawbacks and numerous composites are described in the literature. Each component of these composite materials brings specific properties and their combination can improve the biological integration of the 3D printed scaffold. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B:2579-2595, 2019.

Keywords: 3D printing; bone regeneration; calcium phosphate(s); ceramic; polymer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Thavornyutikarn B, Chantarapanich N, Sitthiseripratip K, Thouas GA, Chen Q. Bone tissue engineering scaffolding: Computer-aided scaffolding techniques. Prog Biomater 2014;3(2-4):61-102.
    1. Bajaj P, Schweller RM, Khademhosseini A, West JL, Bashir R. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2014;16:247-276.
    1. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 2010;31(24):6121-6130.
    1. Kim BS, Jang J, Chae S, Gao G, Kong J-S, Ahn M, Cho D-W. Three-dimensional bioprinting of cell-laden constructs with polycaprolactone protective layers for using various thermoplastic polymers. Biofabrication 2016;8(3):035013.
    1. Ma PX. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 2004;7(5):30-40.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources