Laparoscopic bilateral cervicosacropexy: introduction to a new tunneling technique
- PMID: 30848312
- PMCID: PMC6586690
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03911-2
Laparoscopic bilateral cervicosacropexy: introduction to a new tunneling technique
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: To elevate and suspend the apical end of the vagina, the uterosacral ligaments (USL) were replaced by polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) structures. These PVDF structures were placed in the peritoneal folds of the USL at the pelvic wall to mimic the lateral and backward tension and to avoid rectal obstruction. A special tunneling device was used, which allowed the semi-circular placement of the structure without destroying the peritoneum.
Methods: A 59-year-old woman with mixed urinary incontinence and apical prolapse (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, POP-Q, stage 2) of the uterus underwent laparoscopic bilateral USL replacement. USLs were replaced by PVDF structures by performing the cervicosacropexy (CESA) technique using a semi-circular tunneling device.
Results: Apical support was restored (POP-Q stage 0), and the patient was continent thereafter. The tunneling device was pulled through the peritoneal folds of the USLs toward the cervix. The new USL structures were brought to their physiological position. The new technique did not lead to any complications and did not cause any side effects during 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions: Restoration of apical prolapse and urinary continence was achieved by bilateral USL replacement using a semi-circular tunneling device that was inserted through the lateral abdominal trocar incision.
Keywords: Mixed urinary incontinence; Pelvic organ prolapse; Polyvinylidene fluoride; Urgency urinary incontinence; Uterosacral ligament replacement; Video tutorial; laCESA.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors S. Ludwig and W. Jäger have received travel bursaries from FEG Textiltechnik mbH (Aachen, Germany). The authors B. Morgenstern and P. Mallmann declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Open Abdominal and Laparoscopic Bilateral Uterosacral Ligament Replacement: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 11;14(6):1880. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061880. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40142688 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Bilateral Cervicosacropexy and Vaginosacropexy: New Surgical Treatment Option in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1058-1064. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0474. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 30244596 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Different 'Tensioning' of Apical Suspension in Women Undergoing Surgery for Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.In Vivo. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):1371-1375. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11916. In Vivo. 2020. PMID: 32354933 Free PMC article.
-
Late-occurring pain/other dysfunctions in midurethral sling class actions are likely caused by uterosacral ligament weakness, not implant or surgeon.Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Aug;41(6):1207-1215. doi: 10.1002/nau.24925. Epub 2022 Apr 13. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022. PMID: 35416320 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: indications and techniques.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;57(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000002. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24145362 Review.
Cited by
-
Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study.BMC Surg. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02474-4. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 38877450 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence of Common Pathophysiology Between Stress and Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women.In Vivo. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):2927-2932. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12122. In Vivo. 2020. PMID: 32871834 Free PMC article.
-
AbsorbaTack™ vs. ProTack™ vs. sutures: a biomechanical analysis of cervical fixation methods for laparoscopic apical fixations in the porcine model.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06827-3. Epub 2022 Nov 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 36404354 Free PMC article.
-
Tacks vs. sutures: a biomechanical analysis of sacral bony fixation methods for laparoscopic apical fixations in the porcine model.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;305(3):631-639. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06343-w. Epub 2021 Nov 29. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 34842976 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Open Abdominal and Laparoscopic Bilateral Uterosacral Ligament Replacement: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 11;14(6):1880. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061880. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40142688 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jäger W, Ludwig S, Stumm M, Mallmann P. Standardized bilateral mesh supported uterosacral ligament replacement—cervico-sacropexy (CESA) and vagino-sacropexy (VASA) operations for female genital prolapse. Pelviperineology. 2016;35(1):17–21.
-
- Ludwig SSM, Neumann E, Becker I, Jäger W. Surgical treatment of urgency urinary incontinence, OAB (wet), mixed urinary incontinence, and total incontinence by cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 2016;6:404. doi: 10.4172/2161-0932.1000404. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical