Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;124(8):762-767.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01021-z. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Patient centring and scan length: how inaccurate practice impacts on radiation dose in CT colonography (CTC)

Affiliations

Patient centring and scan length: how inaccurate practice impacts on radiation dose in CT colonography (CTC)

Sergio Salerno et al. Radiol Med. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to acknowledge errors in patients positioning in CT colonography (CTC) and their effect in radiation exposure.

Materials and methods: CTC studies of a total of 199 patients coming from two different referral hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Two parameters have been considered for the analysis: patient position in relation to gantry isocentre and scan length related to the area of interest. CTDI vol and DLP were extracted for each patient. In order to evaluate the estimated effective total dose and the dose to various organs, we used the CT-EXPO® software version 2.2. This software provides estimates of effective dose and doses to the other various organs.

Results: Average value of the patients' position is found to be below the isocentre for 48 ± 25 mm and 29 ± 27 mm in the prone and supine position. It was observed that the increase in CTDI and DLP values for patients in Group 1, due to the inaccurate positioning, was estimated at about 30% and 20% for prone and supine position, respectively, while in Group 2, a decrease in CTDI and DLP values was estimated at about 16% and 18% for prone and supine position, respectively, due to an average position above isocentre. A dose increase ranging from 4 up to 13% was calculated with increasing the over-scanned region below anal orifice.

Conclusion: Radiographers and radiologists need to be aware of dose variation and noise effects on vertical positioning and over-scanning. More accurate training need to be achieved even so when examination protocol varies from general practice.

Keywords: CT colonography; CTC; Estimated; Isocentre; Positioning; Scan length.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Radiol. 2002 Jun;75(894):518-22 - PubMed
    1. Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):3093-101 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84 - PubMed
    1. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332 - PubMed
    1. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources