Comparison of Reverse Sural Artery Flap Healing for Traumatic Injuries Above and Below the Ankle Joint

Abstract

The reverse sural artery (RSA) flap is popular among trauma surgeons to cover the distal third of the leg to the foot. However, flaps that inset in the foot seem to have a high necrosis rate. This study compared the healing of RSA flaps performed for defects proximal to the ankle versus defects distal to the ankle. Patient data were collected retrospectively between January 2005 and December 2009. Eighty-five patients with the lower leg, ankle, and traumatic foot injuries were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (49 patients) had RSA flap cover for soft tissue and bony defect proximal and up to the ankle joint line, and group 2 (36 patients) had RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line. The time to healing and type of healing were compared between the groups. The demographics between the 2 groups were similar. The successful RSA flap healing rate was 65% in group 1 (32 of 49) and 42% in group 2 (15 of 36). The average time to flap healing between the groups was similar (p = .16). Group 1 had predominantly primary healing compared with group 2 (p = .03). Group 2 had a higher reoperation rate for wound necrosis, which was significant (p = .001). The success of the RSA flap is higher when used for proximal to ankle joint line defects. Surgeons should be aware of the chances of flap necrosis when undertaking RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line.

Keywords: ankle joint; flap healing; reverse sural artery flap; wound necrosis.