Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e025925.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025925.

Towards a decision support tool for intensive care discharge: machine learning algorithm development using electronic healthcare data from MIMIC-III and Bristol, UK

Affiliations

Towards a decision support tool for intensive care discharge: machine learning algorithm development using electronic healthcare data from MIMIC-III and Bristol, UK

Christopher J McWilliams et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective is to develop an automated method for detecting patients that are ready for discharge from intensive care.

Design: We used two datasets of routinely collected patient data to test and improve on a set of previously proposed discharge criteria.

Setting: Bristol Royal Infirmary general intensive care unit (GICU).

Patients: Two cohorts derived from historical datasets: 1870 intensive care patients from GICU in Bristol, and 7592 from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III.

Results: In both cohorts few successfully discharged patients met all of the discharge criteria. Both a random forest and a logistic classifier, trained using multiple-source cross-validation, demonstrated improved performance over the original criteria and generalised well between the cohorts. The classifiers showed good agreement on which features were most predictive of readiness-for-discharge, and these were generally consistent with clinical experience. By weighting the discharge criteria according to feature importance from the logistic model we showed improved performance over the original criteria, while retaining good interpretability.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate the feasibility of the proposed approach to ready-for-discharge classification, which could complement other risk models of specific adverse outcomes in a future decision support system. Avenues for improvement to produce a clinically useful tool are identified.

Keywords: cinical audit; health informatics; information technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Performance of the nurse-led discharge criteria and random forest with extended feature set (RFext) evaluated on held-out data for a single train-test split. Left: receiver-operator-characteristic curves with associated area-under-curve scores. Right: precision-recall curves. AUC, area-under-curve; GICU, general intensive care unit; NLD, nurse-led discharge; RF, random forest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubenfeld GD, Rhodes A. How many intensive care beds are enough? Intensive Care Med 2014;40:451–2. 10.1007/s00134-014-3215-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chalfin DB, Trzeciak S, Likourezos A, et al. . Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1477–83. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266585.74905.5A - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso LT, Grion CM, Matsuo T, et al. . Impact of delayed admission to intensive care units on mortality of critically ill patients: a cohort study. Crit Care 2011;15:R28 10.1186/cc9975 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howell MD. Managing ICU throughput and understanding ICU census. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:626–33. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834b3e6e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capuzzo M, Moreno RP, Alvisi R. Admission and discharge of critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:499–504. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833cb874 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types