Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;45(3):351-354.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.026.

Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement

Affiliations

Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement

David L Cooke et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To present the Cooke-modified axial length (CMALInitial) method, which closely approximates sum-of-segments AL. Notably, sum-of-segments AL has been shown to improve predictions of many intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas; however, calculating this AL requires information that is not readily available.

Design: Comparative case series.

Patients: Distinct datasets of 215 eyes and 1442 eyes, which were measured before cataract surgery with a commercially available optical biometer (Lenstar LS 900), were identified. The AL measured by this machine was labeled "traditional AL."

Main outcome measure: Prediction Error.

Methods: The CMALInitial, sum-of-segments AL, and traditional AL methods with Bland-Altman plots and r2 values were compared, along with graphs of prediction errors.

Results: The CMALInitial was developed from 215 eyes and evaluated in the 1422-eye validation dataset. The r2 for CMALInitial versus the sum-of-segments AL was 0.99983. The predictions based on CMALInitial were compared with those based on traditional AL using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and Holladay 2 IOL formulas. The CMALInitial produced more accurate predictions in all four formulas (P < .001). Eyes in all datasets were then combined to create the final recommendation: CMALFinal = 1.23853 + 0.95855 × traditional AL - 0.05467 × lens thickness (all measurements in millimeters).

Conclusions: A modified AL method (CMAL) was easy to calculate. Using CMAL improved predictions for at least four IOL power prediction formulas, especially at extreme ALs. Caution is advised if using CMAL with other formulas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by