Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;35(4):678-681.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01510-9.

Occurrence of Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in the USA, 2017

Samir Soneji  1 , JaeWon Yang  2 , Nichole T Tanner  3   4 , Gerard A Silvestri  3
Affiliations

Occurrence of Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in the USA, 2017

Samir Soneji et al. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Computed tomography lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer mortality. However, screening is underutilized. This study assesses the extent to which providers discuss lung cancer screening with their patients, as a lack of discussion and counseling may serve as a potential cause of low utilization rates. Data from 1667 adults aged 55-80 years sampled in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey was utilized. A weighted multivariable logistic regression model was fit with past-year discussion about lung cancer screening with a provider as the outcome. The adjusted odds of discussion were higher for current cigarette smokers compared to non-cigarette smokers (adjusted odds ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 to 8.74). Despite higher odds, the absolute prevalence was low with only 18% (95% CI, 11.8 to 24.2%) of current adult smokers reporting a past-year discussion. Knowledge of screening from trusted sources of medical information, such as doctors, can increase screening rates and may ultimately reduce lung cancer mortality.

Keywords: Doctor-patient; Lung cancer; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365(5):395–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
    1. Soneji S, Yang J, Tanner NT, Dang R, Silvestri GA, Black W (2017) Underuse of chest radiography versus computed tomography for lung cancer screening. Am J Public Health 107(8):1248–1250. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303919 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Jemal A, Fedewa SA (February 2017) Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States—2010 to 2015. JAMA Oncol 3:1278–1281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kanodra NM, Pope C, Halbert CH, Silvestri GA, Rice LJ, Tanner NT (2016) Primary care provider and patient perspectives on lung cancer screening. A qualitative study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 13(11):1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiener RS, Koppelman E, Bolton R, Lasser KE, Borrelli B, Au DH, Slatore CG, Clark JA, Kathuria H (2018) Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision-making in early adopting lung cancer screening programs: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 33(7):1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4350-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources