Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after abdominopelvic cancer surgery: a retrospective review
- PMID: 30853816
- PMCID: PMC6380653
- DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4339
Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after abdominopelvic cancer surgery: a retrospective review
Abstract
Objective: Extended prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (vte) after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery with low molecular weight heparin (lmwh) is recommended by multiple guidelines. The primary objective of the present study was to assess adherence to that guideline recommendation at tertiary care centres within Hamilton Health Sciences (hhs).
Methods: Given that an estimated 70% of the study population would be expected to receive extended prophylaxis, a sample size of 105 patients was calculated. Patients who had undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer from March 2012 to December 2015 were identified, and data were collected from electronic health records. The primary outcome was prescription of extended vte prophylaxis.
Results: Of 105 patients, only 3 received extended vte prophylaxis. Those 3 patients had serous carcinoma of the uterus, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, and cecal cancer. Of the 3 patients, 2 were followed by the thrombosis service while in hospital; none of the other 102 patients received any form of extended vte prophylaxis.
Conclusions: Based on multiple randomized controlled trials, guidelines suggest lmwh prophylaxis for up to 4 weeks after major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery. Despite those recommendations, postoperative extended vte prophylaxis is not commonly prescribed at hhs facilities. Next steps will include identification of barriers and an examination of how those barriers could be addressed. Failure to use prophylaxis is not consistent with evidence-based guidelines and is placing patients at risk of vte.
Keywords: Extended prophylaxis; cancer-associated thrombosis; low molecular weight heparin.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare the following interests: MC has sat on advisory boards for Octapharma and Bayer; he has participated in study steering committees or other research-related activities for projects involving Daiichi–Sankyo and Bayer; he holds a Career Investigator award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and the Leo Pharma Chair in Thromboembolism Research at McMaster University (income from which is used to support the salary of research employees); his institutions (either or both of McMaster University and St. Joseph’s Healthcare) have received funding for research projects from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Leo Pharma, and Bayer for work in which he is involved; he has received funding for preparation of educational materials or presentations (or both) from Alexion, Bristol–Myers Squibb/ Pfizer alliance, Leo Pharma, Bayer, and CSL Behring; he has participated in various medicolegal activities relating to thrombosis, anticoagulant drugs, or other aspects of hematology practice, and those activities are bound by confidentiality arrangements. Further, this declaration is made to the best of MC’s ability, but might be incomplete or contain material errors, given the foibles of human memory. This work was supported by a Regional Medical Associates scholarship to ML. ME has no conflicts to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and clinically relevant venous thromboembolism after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: international, prospective, propensity score-weighted cohort study.Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 4;112(3):znaf005. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf005. Br J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40067192 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized study on 1-week versus 4-week prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):665-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000340. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 24253138 Clinical Trial.
-
Unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):151-158. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001494. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017. PMID: 28426561 Free PMC article.
-
Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients undergoing major surgery.Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;15(12):3567-78. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0151-4. Epub 2008 Oct 8. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18841419 Review.
-
Extended versus conventional thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1234-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Sep 3. Surgery. 2018. PMID: 30190110
Cited by
-
Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for abdominopelvic surgery: Development and evaluation of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision making.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Nov 14;6(8):e12831. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12831. eCollection 2022 Nov. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022. PMID: 36397933 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical and surgical patients.J Vasc Bras. 2022 Jun 27;21:e20210195. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202101951. eCollection 2022. J Vasc Bras. 2022. PMID: 35836745 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Call to Action for Anticoagulation Stewardship to Address Suboptimal Thromboprophylaxis Practices for at-Risk Non-Orthopedic Surgical Patients in Vietnam: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 24;21:305-326. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S505100. eCollection 2025. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025. PMID: 40297798 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources