Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Mar;98(10):e14632.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014632.

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Chang-Hua Chen  1   2   3   4 , Yu-Min Chen  5 , Yu-Jun Chang  6 , Shu-Hui Wang  7 , Chih-Yen Chang  1 , Hua-Cheng Yen  8
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Chang-Hua Chen et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Severe sepsis and pneumonia are common problems in the intensive care units (ICUs) and cause high morbidity and mortality. Optimal doses and appropriate routes of antibiotics are critical to improve their efficacy, but their appropriate routes remain controversial.

Objective: The efficacy of antibiotic administration among critically ill patient populations remains controversial. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic administration in patients with infection and to assess whether the effect differs between the two antibiotic administration types.

Methods: A systematic search of studies on continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics and traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics for patients with infection was performed mainly in PubMed. The odds ratios (ORs) of the microbiological results as primary outcome and mortality rate, length of stay, and duration of antibiotic treatment as secondary outcomes were evaluated.

Results: The meta-analysis comprised 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies comprising 1957 participants. Current analysis showed that the overall OR of clinical success between the continuous and intermittent groups was 0.675 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.523-0.870). Comparing continuous and intermittent groups, the subgroup analysis showed a lower ICU stay (OR 0.834, 95% CI: 0.542-1.282), a higher mortality (OR 1.433, 95% CI: 1.139-1.801), and a longer antibiotic duration (OR 1.055, 95% CI: 0.659-1.689), but the results of present meta-analysis were not significant because of the limited number of enrolled trials.

Limitations: Heterogeneity of included trials and studies.

Conclusions: The results of present meta-analysis were insufficient to recommend continuous infusion of intravenous antibiotics better than traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics at routine clinical care. Hope large-scale RCT to provide more rebuts evidence for making recommendations to warrant continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics at clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram for search and identification of included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the overall odds ratios for clinical success in the continuous group versus the intermittent group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the overall odds ratios for intensive care unit stay in the continuous group versus the intermittent group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the overall odds ratios for antibiotic duration in the continuous group versus the intermittent group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the overall odds ratios for pulmonary infection in the continuous group versus the intermittent group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot of the odds ratio of clinical success.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot of the odds ratio of intensive care unit stay.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Funnel plot of the odds ratio of antibiotic duration.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Funnel plot of the odds ratio of pulmonary infection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kadri SS, Rhee C, Strich JR, et al. Estimating ten-year trends in septic shock incidence and mortality in United States Academic Medical Centers using clinical data. Chest 2017;151:278–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Xie JF, Yu KJ, et al. Epidemiological study of sepsis in china: protocol of a cross-sectional survey. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016;129:2967–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG. Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, et al. Pneumonia. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine McGraw-Hill Education, 19th ednNew York, NY: 2015.
    1. Civitarese AM, Ruggieri E, Walz JM, et al. A 10-year review of total hospital-onset ICU bloodstream infections at an academic medical center. Chest 2017;151:1011–7. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP. The surviving sepsis campaign: 2013 and beyond. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:1803–5. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances