Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213509.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213509. eCollection 2019.

Impact of climate factors on height growth of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica

Affiliations

Impact of climate factors on height growth of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica

Yanping Zhou et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Tree height growth is sensitive to climate change; therefore, incorporating climate factors into tree height prediction models can improve our understanding of this relationship and provide a scientific basis for plantation management under climate change conditions. Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) is one of the most important afforestation species in Three-North Regions in China. Yet our knowledge on the relationship between height growth and climate for Mongolian pine is limited. Based on survey data for the dominant height of Mongolian pine and climate data from meteorological station, a mixed-effects Chapman-Richards model (including climate factors and random parameters) was used to study the effects of climate factors on the height growth of Mongolian pine in Zhanggutai sandy land, Northeast China. The results showed that precipitation had a delayed effect on the tree height growth. Generally, tree heights increased with increasing mean temperature in May and precipitation from October to April and decreased with increasing precipitation in the previous growing season. The model could effectively predict the dominant height growth of Mongolian pine under varying climate, which could help in further understanding the relationship between climate and height growth of Mongolian pine in semiarid areas of China.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Relationship between height and age of mongolian pine.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Distributions of standardized residuals.
(a) Basic model. (b) Generalized model.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distributions of standardized residuals of the mixed-effects model.
(a) Without constant plus power variance. (b) With variance function.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effects of MTM, PNP, and PGP on tree height growth of mongolian pine.
Subplot a to c represent changes in tree height growth with MTM, PNP, and PGP, respectively. (a) MTM = 14.31°C, 16.31°C, and 18.83°C; PNP = 77.2 mm; PGP = 409.9 mm; (b) PNP = 18.15 mm, 77.2 mm, and 178.4 mm; MTM = 16.31°C; PGP = 409.9 mm; (c) PGP = 166.6 mm, 409.9 mm, and 641.9 mm; MTM = 16.31°C; PNP = 77.2 mm.

References

    1. Bonan GB. Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 2008; 320(5882): 1444–1449. 10.1126/science.1155121 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaya Z, Sewell MM, Neale DB. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing annual height- and diameter-increment growth in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999; 98(3): 586–592. 10.1007/s001220051108 - DOI
    1. Jansons A, Matisons R, Baumanis I, Purina L. Effect of climatic factors on height increment of Scots pine in experimental plantation in Kalsnava, Latvia. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013; 306: 185–191. 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.039 - DOI
    1. Nothdurft A, Wolf T, Ringeler A, Bohner J, Saborowski J. Spatio-temporal prediction of site index based on forest inventories and climate change scenarios. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012; 279: 97–111. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.018 - DOI
    1. Pensa M, Salminen H, Jalkanen R. A 250-year-long height-increment chronology for Pinus sylvestris at the northern coniferous timberline: A novel tool for reconstructing past summer temperatures? Dendrochronologia. 2005; 22(2): 75–81. 10.1016/j.dendro.2005.02.005 - DOI

Publication types