[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical guidelines]
- PMID: 30857745
- DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.02.006
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical guidelines]
Abstract
Clinical guidelines are based on the best available evidence and produced systematically. In this context, the transparent presentation of the decision-making process from evidence to recommendation is indispensable. The Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for clinical practice recommendations enables guideline panels to structure their approach and make it comprehensible. The EtD frameworks include three main sections: formulating the question, assessing the evidence and "Additional considerations" for each criterion, and drawing conclusions. This article focuses on the selection and operationalization of those criteria of the EtD framework that are relevant for clinical recommendations in guidelines. These include the priority of the problem, benefits and harms, certainty of the evidence, importance of the outcome, balance, resource use, equity, acceptability and feasibility. To make a recommendation, a panel must consider the implication and importance of each of the above judgments. The EtD framework helps ensure consideration of key criteria that determine whether an intervention should be recommended and that judgments are informed by the best available evidence.
Keywords: Empfehlungen; Entscheidungsfindung; GRADE; Guidelines; Leitlinien; Summary of Findings; decision-making; recommendations.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Jul;134:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018. PMID: 29929770 German.
-
[GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines.].Recenti Prog Med. 2018 May;109(5):272-293. doi: 10.1701/2902.29246. Recenti Prog Med. 2018. PMID: 29771250 Italian.
-
[GRADE: Using evidence to decision frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo generation of trustworthy guideline recommendations - GRADE-ADOLOPMENT].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Aug;144-145:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019. PMID: 31399391 German.
-
Evidence to decision frameworks enabled structured and explicit development of healthcare recommendations.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 13. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35710054 Review.
-
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.Environ Health. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00794-z. Environ Health. 2021. PMID: 34876125 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Antiplatelet therapy to prevent ischemic events in giant cell arteritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 8;13(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02599-w. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38978122 Free PMC article.
-
ROBVALU: a tool for assessing risk of bias in studies about people's values, utilities, or importance of health outcomes.BMJ. 2024 Jun 12;385:e079890. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079890. BMJ. 2024. PMID: 38866410 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources