Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;69(683):e413-e421.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702677. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public

Affiliations

Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public

Marianne Piano et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS) is to be introduced in England in 2020. This standard is a new policy in which patients should have cancer ruled out or diagnosed within 28 days of referral.

Aim: To explore public attitudes towards the FDS within the context of their recent referral experiences.

Design and setting: Four 90-minute focus groups (two in Guildford, two in Bradford).

Method: Participants aged >50 years without a current cancer diagnosis (N = 29), who had completed certain diagnostic tests, for example, ultrasound, and received results within the last 6 months were recruited. Age, education, and sex were evenly distributed across groups through purposive sampling.

Results: The largest cause of concern was the waiting process for obtaining test results. Most had experienced swift referral, and it was difficult for participants to understand how the new standard could impact upon time progressing through the system. Responsibility for meeting the standard was also a concern: participants did not see their own behaviours as a form of involvement. The GP's role was conceptualised by patients as communicating about their referral, establishing patients' preferences for information, and continued involvement at each stage of the referral process. The standard legitimised chasing for test results, but 28 days was considered too long.

Conclusion: Patients should be asked what they would like to know about their referral. GPs should be more transparent about the referral process and the potential for a lack of clarity around next steps.

Keywords: Faster Diagnosis Standard; cancer; early diagnosis; general practice; patient experience; referral and consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lyratzopoulos G, Vedsted P, Singh H. Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S84–S91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS England Achieving World Class Cancer Outcomes: Taking the strategy forward: five year forward view. 2016 https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cancer-strategy.pdf (accessed 3 Dec 2018)
    1. Cancer Research UK Your urgent referral explained. 2018. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-symptoms/what-is-an-urgent-referral (accessed 19 Feb 2019).
    1. Butow PN, Kazemi JN, Beeney LJ, et al. When the diagnosis is cancer: Patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer. 1996;77(12):2630–2637. - PubMed
    1. Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL. Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int. 2004;93(1):47–51. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources