Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public
- PMID: 30858334
- PMCID: PMC6532807
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702677
Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public
Abstract
Background: The Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS) is to be introduced in England in 2020. This standard is a new policy in which patients should have cancer ruled out or diagnosed within 28 days of referral.
Aim: To explore public attitudes towards the FDS within the context of their recent referral experiences.
Design and setting: Four 90-minute focus groups (two in Guildford, two in Bradford).
Method: Participants aged >50 years without a current cancer diagnosis (N = 29), who had completed certain diagnostic tests, for example, ultrasound, and received results within the last 6 months were recruited. Age, education, and sex were evenly distributed across groups through purposive sampling.
Results: The largest cause of concern was the waiting process for obtaining test results. Most had experienced swift referral, and it was difficult for participants to understand how the new standard could impact upon time progressing through the system. Responsibility for meeting the standard was also a concern: participants did not see their own behaviours as a form of involvement. The GP's role was conceptualised by patients as communicating about their referral, establishing patients' preferences for information, and continued involvement at each stage of the referral process. The standard legitimised chasing for test results, but 28 days was considered too long.
Conclusion: Patients should be asked what they would like to know about their referral. GPs should be more transparent about the referral process and the potential for a lack of clarity around next steps.
Keywords: Faster Diagnosis Standard; cancer; early diagnosis; general practice; patient experience; referral and consultation.
© British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Similar articles
-
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3):B5027. Dan Med J. 2015. PMID: 25748876 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of a continuing medical education meeting on the use and timing of urgent cancer referrals among general practitioners - a before-after study.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0607-3. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 28327100 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15694064 Review.
-
The novel use of fast track CT to select patients for lung cancer clinics: effect on clinic efficiency, waiting times, and patient satisfaction.Postgrad Med J. 2011 Apr;87(1026):264-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.109330. Epub 2011 Jan 27. Postgrad Med J. 2011. PMID: 21273361
-
Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(50):1-106, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta8500. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15546515 Review.
Cited by
-
Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022. PMID: 35254205 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e055488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055488. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34753768 Free PMC article.
-
Symptomatic presentation of cancer in primary care: a scoping review of patients' experiences and needs during the cancer diagnostic pathway.BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e076527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076527. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38508614 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for multi-cancer tests (MCTs) in primary care: discrete choice experiments of general practitioners and the general public in England.Br J Cancer. 2025 Aug;133(3):394-403. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03063-9. Epub 2025 Jun 2. Br J Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40456923 Free PMC article.
-
Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: a qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPs.Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e850-e859. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706625. Print 2019 Dec. Br J Gen Pract. 2019. PMID: 31748378 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHS England Achieving World Class Cancer Outcomes: Taking the strategy forward: five year forward view. 2016 https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cancer-strategy.pdf (accessed 3 Dec 2018)
-
- Cancer Research UK Your urgent referral explained. 2018. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-symptoms/what-is-an-urgent-referral (accessed 19 Feb 2019).
-
- Butow PN, Kazemi JN, Beeney LJ, et al. When the diagnosis is cancer: Patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer. 1996;77(12):2630–2637. - PubMed
-
- Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL. Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int. 2004;93(1):47–51. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources