Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;33(9):2266-2275.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0435-7. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy

Affiliations

Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy

Ujjawal H Gandhi et al. Leukemia. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

The introduction of CD38-targeting monoclonal antibodies (CD38 MoABs), daratumumab and isatuximab, has significantly impacted the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Outcomes of patients with MM refractory to CD38 MoABs have not been described. We analyzed outcomes of 275 MM patients at 14 academic centers with disease refractory to CD38 MoABs. Median interval between MM diagnosis and refractoriness to CD38 MoAB (T0) was 50.1 months. The median overall survival (OS) from T0 for the entire cohort was 8.6 [95% C.I. 7.5-9.9] months, ranging from 11.2 months for patients not simultaneously refractory to an immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent and a proteasome inhibitor (PI) to 5.6 months for "penta-refractory" patients (refractory to CD38 MoAB, 2 PIs and 2 IMiDs). At least one subsequent treatment regimen was employed after T0 in 249 (90%) patients. Overall response rate to first regimen after T0 was 31% with median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of 3.4 and 9.3 months, respectively. PFS was best achieved with combinations of carfilzomib and alkylator (median 5.7 months), and daratumumab and IMiD (median 4.5 months). Patients with MM refractory to CD38 MoAB have poor prognosis and this study provides benchmark for new therapies to be tested in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1–
Figure 1–
OS of MM patients refractory to CD38 MoAB according to refractoriness to PIs and IMiDs (panel a), cytogenetic risk (panel b), LDH (panel c) and renal function (panel d) at time of initiation of index regimen.
Figure 2–
Figure 2–
OS (panel a) and PFS (panel b) of MM patients refractory to CD38 MoAB therapy according to depth of response to next line of therapy.

References

    1. Moreau P, Richardson PG, Cavo M, Orlowski RZ, San Miguel JF, Palumbo A, et al. Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood 2012; 120: 947–959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Pandey S, et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia 2014. May; 28(5): 1122–1128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moreau P. How I treat myeloma with new agents. Blood 2017. September 28; 130(13): 1507–1513. - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clinic proceedings 2016. January; 91(1): 101–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Terpos E, Nahi H, Goldschmidt H, et al. Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study. Leukemia 2017. November; 31(11): 2443–2448. - PubMed

MeSH terms