Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 23;3(3):325-339.
doi: 10.1002/hep4.1310. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Who to Test for Hepatitis C Virus in the Middle East and North Africa?: Pooled Analyses of 2,500 Prevalence Measures, Including 49 Million Tests

Affiliations
Review

Who to Test for Hepatitis C Virus in the Middle East and North Africa?: Pooled Analyses of 2,500 Prevalence Measures, Including 49 Million Tests

Hiam Chemaitelly et al. Hepatol Commun. .

Abstract

Expanding hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment coverage is challenged by limited testing and diagnosis. This study assessed the risk of exposure, for the Middle East and North Africa, by population, yields of testing, and program efficiency of testing strategies. A standardized and systematically assembled database of 2,542 HCV antibody prevalence studies on 49 million individuals was analyzed. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled measures for risk of exposure, risk ratio (RR) of exposure, and yields of testing. Program expansion path curves were calculated to assess program efficiency. Countries clustered into two patterns: generalized versus concentrated epidemics. In generalized epidemics (Egypt and Pakistan) relative to general populations, RR of exposure was 6.8 for people who inject drugs (PWID), 6.7 for populations with liver conditions, and 5.0 for populations with high-risk health care exposures. In concentrated epidemics (remaining countries), corresponding RRs were 97.2, 45.1, and 22.2, respectively. In generalized epidemics, the number of tests needed to identify a chronic infection was 2.5 for PWID, 2.4 for populations with liver conditions, 2.7 for populations with high-risk health care exposures, and 14.2 for general populations. In concentrated epidemics, corresponding numbers were 2.8, 8.6, 5.1, and 222.2, respectively. Program expansion path curves demonstrated major gains in program efficiency by targeting specific populations. Risk of exposure varies immensely by population and shows a distinctive hierarchy, particularly in concentrated epidemics. Testing strategies can be much more efficient through population prioritization by risk of exposure. General population testing is not programmatically efficient in concentrated epidemics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Population epidemiologic classification based on the perceived risk of having been exposed to HCV.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hierarchy of risk of exposure to the infection in MENA countries. (A) Pooled RR of having been exposed to HCV, relative to general populations, for the different population epidemiologic categories for countries with a generalized epidemic (Egypt and Pakistan). (B) Pooled RR relative to general populations but for countries with a concentrated epidemic. (C) Pooled RR relative to general populations for all countries.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Testing program expansion path curve in MENA countries. (A) Testing program expansion path curve for the yield, i.e., for the number of tests necessary to identify one HCV chronically infected individual for countries with a generalized epidemic (Egypt and Pakistan). (B) Testing program expansion path curve but for countries with a concentrated epidemic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I, et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2016;388:1081‐1088. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohd Hanafiah K, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age‐specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology 2013;57:1333‐1342. - PubMed
    1. Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:107‐115. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . The Global Hepatitis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017.
    1. Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi‐Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2014;61(Suppl.):S45‐S57. - PubMed