Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;43(3):349-355.
doi: 10.1177/0309364619836023. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

Clinical effects of transparent facial pressure masks: A literature review

Sander B Kant  1 , Carlo Colla  1 , Eric van den Kerckhove  1   2   3 , Andrzej Piatkowski de Grzymala  1
Affiliations
Review

Clinical effects of transparent facial pressure masks: A literature review

Sander B Kant et al. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Severe facial hypertrophic scars are known to severely impact emotional well-being. Pressure therapy by means of transparent face masks has been used for almost 40 years, but evidence about the clinical effects remains sparse.

Objectives: To provide a summary on the efficacy of transparent face masks in the treatment of facial hypertrophic scars.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases through 1 January 2018. Articles describing the clinical effects of facial pressure therapy for remodeling the face after trauma or surgery with a validated tool were included. This review included studies of participants treated with facial hypertrophic scars, both minors and adults.

Results: Three articles involving 33 patients were selected for inclusion. Two studies described statistically significant improvement in facial scars measured by durometer, ultrasound, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

Conclusions: Facial pressure masks have been shown to deliver significant improvement in facial scars, measured by both subjective and objective tools. However, only three studies could be included in this literature review. Also, because of considerable limitations of the studies, it remains difficult to draw substantial conclusions about the efficacy of transparent face masks.

Clinical relevance: This literature review provides a summary of the current evidence on the subjectively and objectively measured clinical effects of transparent face masks in the treatment of facial scars, highlighting the need for further research on this topic.

Keywords: Orthotics; face masks; facial scars; pressure therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rivers EA, Strate RG, Solem LD. The transparent face mask. Am J Occup Ther 1979; 33: 108–113. - PubMed
    1. Shons AR, Rivers EA, Solem LD. A rigid transparent face mask for control of scar hypertrophy. Ann Plast Surg 1981; 6(3): 245–248. - PubMed
    1. Powell BW, Haylock C, Clarke JA. A semi-rigid transparent face mask in the treatment of postburn hypertrophic scars. Br J Plast Surg 1985; 38(4): 561–566. - PubMed
    1. Groce A, Meyers-Paal R, Herndon DN, et al. Are your thoughts of facial pressure transparent? J Burn Care Rehabil 1999; 20(6): 478–481. - PubMed
    1. Parry I, Hanley C, Niszczak J, et al. Harnessing the transparent face orthosis for facial scar management: a comparison of methods. Burns 2013; 39(5): 950–956. - PubMed