Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Nov 27;69(12):2045-2056.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz181.

Fosfomycin for Injection (ZTI-01) Versus Piperacillin-tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Acute Pyelonephritis: ZEUS, A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Fosfomycin for Injection (ZTI-01) Versus Piperacillin-tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Acute Pyelonephritis: ZEUS, A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial

Keith S Kaye et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is an epoxide antibiotic with a differentiated mechanism of action (MOA) inhibiting an early step in bacterial cell wall synthesis. ZTI-01 has broad in vitro spectrum of activity, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and is being developed for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP) in the United States.

Methods: Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/AP were randomized 1:1 to 6 g ZTI-01 q8h or 4.5 g intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) q8h for a fixed 7-day course (no oral switch); patients with concomitant bacteremia could receive up to 14 days.

Results: Of 465 randomized patients, 233 and 231 were treated with ZTI-01 and PIP-TAZ, respectively. In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population, ZTI-01 met the primary objective of noninferiority compared with PIP-TAZ with overall success rates of 64.7% (119/184 patients) vs 54.5% (97/178 patients), respectively; treatment difference was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4, 20.8). Clinical cure rates at test of cure (TOC, day 19-21) were high and similar between treatments (90.8% [167/184] vs 91.6% [163/178], respectively). In post hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates at TOC in m-MITT were 69.0% (127/184) for ZTI-01 versus 57.3% (102/178) for PIP-TAZ (difference 11.7% 95% CI: 1.3, 22.1). ZTI-01 was well tolerated. Most treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypokalemia and elevated serum aminotransferases, were mild and transient.

Conclusions: ZTI-01 was effective for treatment of cUTI including AP and offers a new IV therapeutic option with a differentiated MOA for patients with serious Gram-negative infections.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02753946.

Keywords: ZTI-01; acute pyelonephritis; complicated urinary tract infection; fosfomycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. N: Number of patients in the ITT population. Percentages were calculated using the number of patients in the ITT population as the denominator. A, Completed study drug was defined as completing 7 to 14 days of treatment. B, Only included patients who received study drug. Patient 1401–16 had an adverse event and did not receive study drug. Abbreviations: ITT, intent-to-treat; LFU, late follow-up; PIP-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; TOC, test of cure; ZTI-01, fosfomycin for injection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Analysis population disposition. Percentages were calculated using the number of patients in the ITT population as the denominator. Abbreviations: CE, clinical evaluable; CFU, colony-forming unit; EOT, end of treatment; I/E, inclusion/exclusion; ITT, intent-to-treat; LFU, late follow-up; ME, microbiologic evaluable; MITT, modified intent to treat; m-MITT, microbiologic modified intent to treat; PIP-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; TOC, test of cure; ZTI-01, fosfomycin for injection.

Comment in

References

    1. Alemayehu D, Quinn J, Cook J, Kunkel M, Knirsch CA. A paradigm shift in drug development for treatment of rare multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:562–7. - PubMed
    1. Shields RK, Potoski BA, Haidar G, et al. Clinical outcomes, drug toxicity, and emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance among patients treated for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1615–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falagas ME, Vouloumanou EK, Samonis G, Vardakas KZ. Fosfomycin. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016; 29:321–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falagas ME, Maraki S, Karageorgopoulos DE, Kastoris AC, Mavromanolakis E, Samonis G. Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae isolates to fosfomycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35:240–3. - PubMed
    1. Monurol (fosfomycin tromethamine) sachet prescribing information, 2011 February. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/050717s005lbl.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2017.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data