Relative Risk Perceptions between Snus and Cigarettes in a Snus-Prevalent Society-An Observational Study over a 16 Year Period
- PMID: 30862006
- PMCID: PMC6427464
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050879
Relative Risk Perceptions between Snus and Cigarettes in a Snus-Prevalent Society-An Observational Study over a 16 Year Period
Abstract
Background: Most studies on perceived risks of smokeless tobacco products (SLT) have been conducted in the U.S., and the vast majority conclude that perceptions of the relative harmfulness of SLT versus cigarettes in the population are inconsistent with epidemiologically-based risk estimates, and typically conflated to that of cigarettes. We tested whether such inaccuracies also existed in Norway, where SLT-products are less toxic (Swedish snus) and SLT use is more prevalent than in the U.S. Methods: Over a 16 years period (2003⁻2018), 13,381 respondents (aged 16⁻79 years) answered questions about risk perceptions in Statistics Norway's nationally representative survey of tobacco behavior. We applied an indirect measure of comparative harm where risk beliefs for eight nicotine products were assessed independently of other products and then compared the answers. The wording of the question was: "We will now mention a variety of nicotine products and ask you how harmful you think daily use of these are. Use a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is slightly harmful and 7 is very harmful". Mean scores with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: The overall risk score for cigarettes was 6.48. The risk score for snus was 5.14⁻79.3% of the risk score of cigarettes. The relative risk scores for e-cigarettes (3.78) and NRT products (3.39) was 58.4% and 52.3% when compared to cigarettes. Perceptions of risk were stable over time. A strong association was observed between perceived risk of snus and having used snus in attempts to quit smoking. Conclusion: Perceptions of relative risk between snus and cigarettes is inconsistent with estimates from medical expert committees, which assess the overall health risk from use of Swedish snus to be minor when compared to the risk from smoking. Like the situation in the US, incorrect beliefs about SLT risks seem to be prevalent also in the snus-prevalent Norwegian setting. Accurate information on differential harms needs to be communicated. Future research should try to identify reasons why health authorities in the US and Scandinavia allow these well-documented misconceptions to persist.
Keywords: NRT; e-cigarettes; relative risk perception; risk perception; smokeless tobacco; snus; tobacco.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
How do Smokers in a Snus-Prevalent Society Consider E-cigarettes, Snus, and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Products as Relevant Replacements for Cigarettes in the Event They Should Stop Smoking?Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Sep 4;25(11):1753-1761. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad113. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023. PMID: 37410922 Free PMC article.
-
Interviews with smokers about smokeless tobacco products, risk messages and news articles.Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(6):671-678. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052412. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 26576840 Free PMC article.
-
Association between willingness to use snus to quit smoking and perception of relative risk between snus and cigarettes.Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Oct;14(10):1221-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts077. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012. PMID: 22416114 Free PMC article.
-
How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes.Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e49-e58. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053060. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Tob Control. 2017. PMID: 27625408 Review.
-
[Harm reduction strategy in tobacco control].Epidemiol Prev. 2011 May-Aug;35(3-4 Suppl 1):19-32. Epidemiol Prev. 2011. PMID: 21926451 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Challenges in legitimizing further measures against smoking in jurisdictions with robust infrastructure for tobacco control: how far can the authorities allow themselves to go?Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 7;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00951-w. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 38321438 Free PMC article.
-
'95% less harmful'? Exploring reactions to quantitative modified risk claims for snus and e-cigarettes.Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(6):730-736. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056303. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Tob Control. 2022. PMID: 33753549 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of tobacco cessation including a prescription approach among patients in Swedish primary health care with a focus on socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240411. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33044990 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health warning labels describing snus as less harmful than smoking: effects on perceptions of risk.Harm Reduct J. 2020 Jun 5;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00380-5. Harm Reduct J. 2020. PMID: 32503564 Free PMC article.
-
Nicotine Content in Swedish-Type Snus Sold in Norway From 2005 to 2020.Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Jun 15;24(7):1130-1133. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac006. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022. PMID: 35022786 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Glanz K., Rimer B.K., Viswanath K., editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical