"Can do" versus "do do": A Novel Concept to Better Understand Physical Functioning in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- PMID: 30862102
- PMCID: PMC6463143
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm8030340
"Can do" versus "do do": A Novel Concept to Better Understand Physical Functioning in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Abstract
Background: Physical capacity (PC) and physical activity (PA) represent associated but separate domains of physical function. It remains unknown whether this framework may support a better understanding of the impaired physical function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The current study had two aims: (1) to determine the distribution of patients with COPD over the PC-PA quadrants, and (2) to explore whether differences exist in clinical characteristics between these quadrants.
Methods: In this retrospective study, PC was measured using the six-minute walk distance (6MWD), and PA was assessed with an accelerometer. Moreover, patients' clinical characteristics were obtained. Patients were divided into the following quadrants: (I) low PC (6MWD <70% predicted), low PA, using a step-defined inactivity index (<5000 steps/day, "can't do, don't do" quadrant); (II) preserved PC, low PA ("can do, don't do" quadrant); (III) low PC, preserved PA ("can't do, do do" quadrant); and (IV) preserved PC, preserved PA ("can do, do do" quadrant).
Results: The distribution of the 662 COPD patients over the quadrants was as follows: "can't do, don't do": 34%; "can do, don't do": 14%; "can't do, do do": 21%; and "can do, do do": 31%. Statistically significant differences between quadrants were found for all clinical characteristics, except for educational levels.
Conclusions: This study proves the applicability of the PC-PA quadrant concept in COPD. This concept serves as a pragmatic clinical tool, that may be useful in the understanding of the impaired physical functioning in COPD patients and therefore, may improve the selection of appropriate interventions to improve physical function.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; exercise; physical activity; physical function.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Puente-Maestu L., Palange P., Casaburi R., Laveneziana P., Maltais F., Neder J.A., O’Donnell D.E., Onorati P., Porszasz J., Rabinovich R., et al. Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: An official ers statement. Eur. Respir. J. 2016;47:429–460. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00745-2015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. [(accessed on 29 March 2018)]; Available online: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/pa/en/
-
- Sievi N.A., Brack T., Brutsche M.H., Frey M., Irani S., Leuppi J.D., Thurnheer R., Kohler M., Clarenbach C.F. Accelerometer- versus questionnaire-based assessment of physical activity and their changes over time in patients with copd. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2017;12:1113–1118. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S130195. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- The Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Copd, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (Gold) 2017. [(accessed on 29 March 2018)]; Available online: http://goldcopd.org/gold-reports-2017/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
