Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 29;15(3):20190006.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0006.

Fossorial Damaraland mole rats do not exhibit a blunted hypercapnic ventilatory response

Affiliations

Fossorial Damaraland mole rats do not exhibit a blunted hypercapnic ventilatory response

Sarah Y Zhang et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Damaraland mole rats (DMRs, Fukomys damarensis) are a eusocial fossorial species that spend the majority of their life in densely populated underground burrows, in which they likely experience intermittent periods of elevated CO2 (i.e. hypercapnia). The primary physiological response to hypercapnia in most mammals is to increase depth and rate of breathing (i.e. hyperpnoea), but this response is often blunted in species that inhabit hypercapnic environments. In their natural habitat, DMRs putatively experience a gaseous environment ranging from normocapnic (0.1% CO2) to hypercapnic (6.0% CO2) conditions (Roper et al. 2001 J. Zool. 254, 101-107). As such, we hypothesized that DMRs would exhibit blunted hypercapnic ventilatory and metabolic responses, relative to those of non-fossorial rodent species. To test this hypothesis, we exposed awake, freely behaving DMRs to normoxic normocapnia (21% O2, 0% CO2, balance N2) or graded normoxic hypercapnia (21% O2, 0, 2, 5, 7 and 10% CO2, balance N2), and measured ventilation and metabolism using whole-body plethysmography and indirect calorimetry, respectively. We found that ventilation and metabolism were unchanged during prolonged normocapnia, whereas during graded hypercapnia, ventilation was elevated at 2% CO2 and above. As a result, O2 extraction efficiency at the lungs decreased with increasing hyperpnoea. Conversely, metabolic rate did not increase until 10% CO2, presumably due to the metabolic cost of hyperpnoea. Taken together, our results suggest that despite their fossorial lifestyle, DMRs do not exhibit adaptations in their ventilatory or metabolic responses to environmental hypercapnia.

Keywords: hypercapnic metabolic response; hypercapnic ventilatory response; hyperpnoea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Damaraland mole rat hypercapnic ventilatory response is not blunted. (ac) Average minute ventilation (V˙E, a), breathing frequency (fR; b), and tidal volume (VT; c), were measured from Damaraland mole rats during either 5 h normocapnia (0% CO2; black circles, solid lines), or 1-h consecutive step-wise increases in CO2 concentration (0, 2, 5, 7 and 10%; open circles, dashed lines). All data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. from n = 9 Damaraland mole rats per group. Significance was assessed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference from the corresponding time point during normocapnic trials (p < 0.05).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Damaraland mole rats offset hypercapnic hyperventilation with an increase in metabolic rate. (af) Average O2 consumption (V˙O2; a), average rate of CO2 production (V˙CO2; b), air convection requirement of O2 (ACRVO2; c), air convection requirement of CO2 (ACRVCO2; d), respiratory exchange ratio (RER; e), and extraction efficiency of O2 (eO2; f) were measured from Damaraland mole rats during either 5 h normocapnia (0% CO2; black circles, solid lines), or 1-h consecutive step-wise increases in CO2 concentration (0, 2, 5, 7 and 10%; open circles, dashed lines). Due to equipment limitations, V˙CO2, RER, and ACRVCO2 data were not collected during the 10% CO2 stage. All data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. from n = 9 Damaraland mole rats per group. Significance was assessed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference from the corresponding time point during normocapnic trials (p < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burnett LE. 1997. The challenges of living in hypoxic and hypercapnic aquatic environments. Environments 37, 633–640.
    1. Williams DD, Rausch RL. 1973. Seasonal carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations in the dens of hibernating mammals (Sciuridae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 44, 1227–1235. (10.1016/0300-9629(73)90261-2) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bigatello LM, Patroniti N, Sangalli F. 2001. Permissive hypercapnia. Curr. Opin Crit. Care 7, 34–40. (10.1097/00075198-200102000-00006) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharabi K, Lecuona E, Helenius IT, Beitel GJ, Sznajder JI, Gruenbaum Y. 2009. Sensing, physiological effects and molecular response to elevated CO2 levels in eukaryotes. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13, 4304–4318. (10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00952.x) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iturriaga R, Del Rio R, Idiaquez J, Somers VK. 2016. Carotid body chemoreceptors, sympathetic neural activation, and cardiometabolic disease. Biol. Res. 49, 1–9. (10.1186/s40659-016-0073-8) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types