Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1505-1516.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X. Epub 2019 Mar 9.

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Gus Gazzard et al. Lancet. .

Erratum in

  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2019 Jul 6;394(10192):e1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31503-X. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31282363 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension are habitually treated with eye drops that lower intraocular pressure. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a safe alternative but is rarely used as first-line treatment. We compared the two.

Methods: In this observer-masked, randomised controlled trial treatment-naive patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and no ocular comorbidities were recruited between 2012 and 2014 at six UK hospitals. They were randomly allocated (web-based randomisation) to initial selective laser trabeculoplasty or to eye drops. An objective target intraocular pressure was set according to glaucoma severity. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 3 years (assessed by EQ-5D). Secondary outcomes were cost and cost-effectiveness, disease-specific HRQoL, clinical effectiveness, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN32038223).

Findings: Of 718 patients enrolled, 356 were randomised to the selective laser trabeculoplasty and 362 to the eye drops group. 652 (91%) returned the primary outcome questionnaire at 36 months. Average EQ-5D score was 0·89 (SD 0·18) in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group versus 0·90 (SD 0·16) in the eye drops group, with no significant difference (difference 0·01, 95% CI -0·01 to 0·03; p=0·23). At 36 months, 74·2% (95% CI 69·3-78·6) of patients in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group required no drops to maintain intraocular pressure at target. Eyes of patients in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group were within target intracoluar pressure at more visits (93·0%) than in the eye drops group (91·3%), with glaucoma surgery to lower intraocular pressure required in none versus 11 patients. Over 36 months, from an ophthalmology cost perspective, there was a 97% probability of selective laser trabeculoplasty as first treatment being more cost-effective than eye drops first at a willingness to pay of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Interpretation: Selective laser trabeculoplasty should be offered as a first-line treatment for open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, supporting a change in clinical practice.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Health and Technology Assessment Programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile SLT=selective laser trabeculoplasty. *Two patients were randomised twice due to computer failure: one was initially randomised to medication but was subsequently randomised to, and received, SLT. The other was initially randomised to SLT but was subsequently randomised to, and received, medication. These patients are included in the figure according to their second randomisations. In addition, four other patients who did not meet the eligibility criteria (and could not receive treatment) were randomised in error. These patients were subsequently removed from the study and are not included in the total randomised.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean EQ-5D, GUI, GSS, and GQL-15 scores at each time point, across 36 months Time-point ‘0’ refers to pre-treatment. EQ-5D=EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels. GUI=Glaucoma Utility Index. GSS=Glaucoma Symptom Scale. GQL-15=Glaucoma Quality of Life-15. *Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. †Higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life.

Comment in

References

    1. Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chiasson LA, Chauhan BC. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1149–1155. - PubMed
    1. Haymes SA, LeBlanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chiasson LA, Chauhan BC. Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3035–3041. - PubMed
    1. Bunce C, Wormald R. Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England & Wales. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP, Bunce C. Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1295–1304. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances