Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May:162:177-183.
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 9.

Resurgence of a target behavior suppressed by a combination of punishment and alternative reinforcement

Affiliations

Resurgence of a target behavior suppressed by a combination of punishment and alternative reinforcement

Rusty W Nall et al. Behav Processes. 2019 May.

Abstract

Differential-reinforcement-based treatments involving extinction of target problem behavior and reinforcement of an alternative behavior are highly effective. However, extinction of problem behavior is sometimes difficult or contraindicated in clinical settings. In such cases, punishment instead of extinction may be used in combination with alternative reinforcement. Although it is well documented that omitting alternative reinforcement can produce recurrence (i.e., resurgence) of behavior previously suppressed by extinction plus alternative reinforcement, it remains unclear if resurgence similarly occurs for behavior previously suppressed by punishment plus alternative reinforcement. The present experiment examined this question with rats. In Phase 1, a target behavior (lever pressing) was reinforced with food pellets. In Phase 2, the target behavior continued to be reinforced, but it also produced mild foot shock and an alternative behavior (nose poking) also produced food. Finally, all consequences were removed and resurgence of target behavior occurred. Resurgence did not occur for another group that similarly received punishment of target behavior in Phase 2 but not alternative reinforcement. These results indicate that resurgence was a product of the history of exposure to and then removal of alternative reinforcement and that the removal of punishment alone did not produce resurgence of target behavior.

Keywords: Punishment; Rats; Relapse; Resurgence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Target response rates from all sessions of Phase 1 (Baseline) and Phase 2 (Punishment) for both groups. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Alternative response rates from all sessions of Phases 2 (Punishment) and 3 (Resurgence) for both groups. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Target response rates during the last session of Phase 2 (Last Pun) and all sessions of Phase 3 (Resurgence) for both groups. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, & Walker SC (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
    1. Baum WM, & Rachlin HC (1969). Choice as time allocation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(6), 861–874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2016). Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts. Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts
    1. Boe EE (1964). Extinction As a Function of Intensity of Punishment, Amount of. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18(1962), 328–342. - PubMed
    1. Bouton ME, & Schepers ST (2015). Renewal after the punishment of free operant behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(1), 81–90. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources