Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Mar 12;12(3):e227136.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227136.

Infected chronic sinus secondary to a retained fragment of radial artery introducer sheath following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Affiliations
Case Reports

Infected chronic sinus secondary to a retained fragment of radial artery introducer sheath following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Christopher George Ghazala et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are frequently performed procedures in the UK and the developed world, with the radial artery becoming the preferred route of access. A chronically retained macroscopic fragment of radial artery introducer sheath is a very rare complication that has not, to our knowledge, been reported. We report the case of a 62-year-old woman who underwent PCI and developed a persisting infected sinus and abscess at the cannulation site despite multiple courses of antibiotics. Surgical exploration of the forearm recovered a foreign body that was found in the brachioradialis muscle and resembled a fragment of hydrophilic sheath. In conclusion, this case highlights that it is possible to leave macroscopic fragments of hydrophilic sheaths in situ. This is likely to be encountered during difficult access, especially during arterial spasm, and it is advised that the sheath and any other vascular access device is thoroughly inspected following removal.

Keywords: cardiovascular medicine; interventional cardiology; interventional radiology; orthopaedic and trauma surgery; orthopaedics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound scan of the right forearm, demonstrating two linear luminal abnormalities approximately 15 mm in length, which are reminiscent of foreign bodies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
T1-weighted sagittal MRI with contrast, demonstrating a well-circumscribed linear non-enhancing focus measuring 12 mm in length, localised 15 cm proximal to the wrist joint.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative photograph showing the hydrophilic sheath within the right brachioradialis muscle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Two surgical specimens. On the left is the hydrophilic radial artery sheath, and on the right is the excised tract of chronically inflammed tissue.

References

    1. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. National Audit of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Annual Public Report. www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/adultpercutaneous/reports (accessed 19 Sep 2016).
    1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. . Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3–7. 10.1002/ccd.1810160103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, et al. . Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2465–76. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilchrist IC, Kozak M. Hydrophilic-coated radial sheaths: a leap forward, but watch where you land. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:484–5. 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.008 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types